Table 3.

Hierarchical linear regression analysis among parents of children with an intellectual disability.

Models	Variables	B	SE	β	t	95%CI	R2	F
Model 1	Age	−0.02	0.02	−0.03	−0.73	−0.06, 0.03	0.03	4.54 **
	Sex	−0.12	0.30	−0.02	−0.40	−0.70, 0.47
	Family monthly income	−0.11	0.13	−0.03	−0.84	−0.37, 0.15
	Working state	0.20	0.15	0.05	1.35	−0.09, 0.50
	(Child) Age	0.08	0.04	0.08	1.99 *	0.00, 0.17
	(Child) Sex	0.30	0.25	0.04	1.19	−0.19, 0.79
	Neuroticism	1.10	0.23	0.18	4.81 **	0.65, 1.55
Model 2	Age	0.01	0.02	0.02	0.56	−0.03, 0.06	0.19	11.71 **
	Sex	−0.06	0.28	−0.01	−0.21	−0.60, 0.48
	Family monthly income	0.04	0.12	0.01	0.33	−0.20, 0.28
	Working state	0.10	0.14	0.03	0.70	−0.18, 0.37
	(Child) Age	0.10	0.04	0.10	2.52 *	0.02, 0.18
	(Child) Sex	0.20	0.23	0.03	0.87	−0.25, 0.66
	Neuroticism	0.44	0.23	0.07	1.90 *	−0.02, 0.89
	Behavioral problems (of children)	0.72	0.27	0.10	2.70 **	0.20, 1.25
	Psychological demand (of parents)	0.96	0.23	0.15	4.09 **	0.50, 1.42
	Family support	−0.82	0.15	−0.30	−5.40 **	−1.12, −0.52
	Friend support	0.07	0.17	0.02	0.39	−0.27, 0.40
	The other necessary support	0.24	0.17	0.08	1.38	−0.10, 0.58
	Parenting distress	0.46	0.18	0.12	2.56 *	0.11, 0.81
	Parent–child dysfunctional interaction	−0.17	0.23	−0.05	−0.76	−0.62, 0.27
	Difficult child	0.40	0.16	0.13	2.46 *	0.08, 0.71

Note: all the variables are centered at their mean. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.