Table 2.
Model | χ2 | df | S-Bχ2 | CFI | TLI | RMSEA [90% CI] |
Δχ2 | Δdf | p | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CT-CM model | 5803.79 | 1310 | 1.1963 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.05 [0.04–0.05] | ||||
2 | NT-CM model | 10020.64 | 1367 | 1.1974 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.07 [0.06–0.07] | 2 vs. 1 | 4134.88 | 57 | <0.0001 |
3 | PCT-CM model | 7022.20 | 1313 | 1.1973 | 0.89 | 0.88 | 0.05 [0.04–0.05] | 3 vs. 1 | 896.35 | 3 | <0.0001 |
4 | CT-PCM model | 11203.54 | 1320 | 1.1973 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.07 [0.06–0.07] | 4 vs. 1 | 4871.58 | 10 | <0.0001 |
Note. χ2 = chi-square; S-Bχ2 = Satorra–Bentler scaling factor for chi-square; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; Δχ2 = difference in chi-square; Δdf = difference in degrees of freedom; p = p-value.