Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;10(12):994. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10120994

Table 1.

Comparison of NASA-TLX and ICA at baseline and at a two-week follow-up (n = 38).

Variable Baseline Follow-up Pearson r ICC, (95% CI) MDC90
0-back, NASA-TLX 19.51 (15.95) 21.98 (17.89) 0.68 a 0.81 (0.61–0.90) a 15.82
0-back, mean ICA L 0.33 (0.14) 0.24 (0.15) 0.46 b 0.63 (0.26–0.83) b 0.20
0-back, mean ICA R 0.27 (0.17) 0.28 (0.16) 0.55 b 0.70 (0.40–0.85) a 0.22
1-back, NASA-TLX 28.24 (17.80) 27.22 (16.96) 0.60 a 0.78 (0.57–0.89) a 19.37
1-back, mean ICA L 0.29 (0.17) 0.27 (0.14) 0.58 a 0.73 (0.47–0.86) a 0.20
1-back, mean ICA R 0.25 (0.16) 0.30 (0.15) 0.39 c 0.56 (0.12–0.78) b 0.25
2-back, NASA-TLX 50.92 (19.41) 50.61 (19.13) 0.55 b 0.71 (0.42–0.85) a 24.33
2-back, mean ICA L 0.25 (0.14) 0.23 (0.16) 0.50 b 0.64 (0.29–0.82) a 0.24
2-back, mean ICA R 0.24 (0.18) 0.25 (0.15) 0.45 b 0.62 (0.20–0.82) b 0.25

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ICA, Index of Cognitive Activity; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; L, left, NASA-TLX, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index; MDC, minimal detectable difference; R, right. a p < 0.0001, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.05.