Table 3.
Comparative analysis of two kinds of object detection methods.
Methods | Onestage Object Detection | Twostage Object Detection |
---|---|---|
Principle | The input original image is processed directly to obtain the position coordinate value and category probability. The position is corrected thereafter. | Candidate regions are extracted from the input image through selective search and region generation network. Thereafter, convolution, pooling, and other processing is conducted to obtain feature maps. |
Advantage | In the case of the low input separation rate, the speed and accuracy can be balanced simultaneously, and the detection speed is fast, which can reach above 45 FPS. | The deep semantic features of the object can be obtained. The detection accuracy of the object is high, whether it is a small object or a scene with considerable density. |
Insufficient | Low accuracy for small objects and prone to miss detection, low positioning accuracy. | The algorithm has a large volume, large amount of stored data, complicated calculation process, and slow detection speed. |
Realtime | Realtime. | Cannot reach real time |