Table 1.
Summary of studies related to fats and CVD.
Author | Type of Study | Purpose | Included | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|
[11] | Meta-Analysis of prospective epidemiological studies |
21 studies related to the association of dietary saturated fat with CHD, stroke, CVD; CHD inclusive of stroke. | 5–23 years of follow-up of 347,747 subjects | No significant evidence that saturated fat is associated with increased risk of CHD or CVD |
[41] | Epidemiological Cohort | Associations between consumption of carbohydrate, total fat, and each type of fat with cardiovascular disease and total mortality. | Dietary intake of 135,335 individuals aged 35–70 years, in 18 countries; median follow-up 74 years, | ↑ Carbohydrate intake associated with ↑ risk of total mortality; total fat and types of fat related to ↓ total mortality. Total fat and types of fat not associated with CVD, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular disease mortality, saturated fat had an inverse association with stroke. |
[22] | Prospective Cohort | Associations between intakes of individual SFAs and their food sources in relation to the risk of CHD. | 80,082 women aged 34–59 Nurse’s Health Study; 14-year follow up |
Short- to medium-chain fats not associated with CHD risk; intake of longer chain = ↑ risk; ratio of PUFA to SFA inversely associated with CHD risk. |
[14] | Meta-Analysis of observational studies |
Associations between intake of saturated fat and trans unsaturated fat and all cause mortality, CVD and associated mortality, CHD and associated mortality, ischemic stroke, and type 2 diabetes. | 41 studies on saturated fats and health outcomes in prospective cohort studies published between 1981 and 2014; 67 data points; 20 studies with 28 data points for trans fats | Saturated fats are not associated with all cause mortality, CVD, CHD, ischemic stroke, or type 2 diabetes, but the evidence is heterogeneous with methodological limitations. Trans fats are associated with all cause mortality, total CHD, and CHD mortality. |
[23] | Prospective Cohort | Associations of SFAs compared to PUFAs and carbohydrates to CHD risk. | 84,628 women 42,908 men 24–30 year follow up | ↑ Intake of PUFAs and whole grains = ↓ risk of CHD; replacing 5% of energy intake from SFAs with PUFAs, MUFAs, or carbohydrates from whole grains was associated with a 25%, 15%, and 9% ↓ risk of CHD. |
[42] | Prospective Cohort | Association between fat intake and CHD. | 43,757 men aged 40 to 75 years; 6 year follow up | SFA intake not associated with CHD once corrected for fiber intake; ↑ linolenic acid = ↓ risk CHD. |
[43] | Prospective Cohort | Association between dietary SFA and CHD depends on the food source, the carbon chain length of SFA, and the substituting macronutrient. | 4722 Dutch men and women > 55 years; 16.3 year follow up | ↑ Intake of palmitic acid ↑ risk; other SFAs are not associated with CHD; no effect of food source of SFA; replacement of SFA with animal protein ↑ risk; replacement with other macronutrients not associated with risk. |
[44] | Prospective Cohort and Meta-Analysis | Association between carbohydrate intake and mortality. | 15,428 aged 55–64 years ARIC study; 25 year follow up | U-shaped relationship between carbohydrate intake and mortality; low carbohydrate intake with animal protein increased risk, while with high plant protein decreased risk. |
[45] | Prospective population study | Association of macronutrient intake with all cause mortality and CVD, and the implications for dietary advice. | 195,658 adults 10.6 year follow up | Carbohydrate intake > 50% ↑ association with mortality; ↑ intake of MUFA, ↓ intake of PUFA, ↓ intake of SFA = ↓ risk of mortality. |
[46] | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs | Assess the impact of phytosterol (PS) supplementation on serum Lp(a) and FFA concentration. | 12 effect sizes from 7 different studies | PS supplementation = ↓ in Lp(a) and FFA. |
[37] | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | Examine the evidence surrounding coconut oil consumption and its impact on cardiovascular health. | 12 studies | Compared with plant oils and animal oils, coconut oil ↑ HDL-C by 0.57 mg/dL and 0.33 mg/dL. Coconut oil significantly ↑ LDL-C by 0.26 mg/dL compared with plant oils and ↓ LDL-C (48.1%) compared with animal oils. No effects on triglyceride. Better lipid profiles were demonstrated with the virgin form of coconut oil. |
[49] | Prospective Cohort | Association between coconut oil intake and plasma lipid profiles. | 1896 Filipino women aged 35–69 years | In pre-menopausal women, dietary coconut oil use was associated with TC and HDL-C, not in post-menopausal women; coconut oil did not elevate TC, triglyceride levels, and TC/HDL. |
[47] | RCT | Compare changes in blood lipid profile, weight, fat distribution, and metabolic markers after four weeks of consumption of 50 g daily of extra virgin coconut oil, butter, or extra virgin olive oil. | 91 men and women | LDL-C significantly increased on butter compared with coconut oil and with olive oil, no differences in change of LDL-C in coconut oil compared with olive oil. Coconut oil significantly increased HDL-C compared with butter or olive oil. Butter significantly increased TC/HDL-C ratio and non-HDL-C compared with coconut oil, while coconut oil did not significantly differ from olive oil for TC/HDL-C and non-HDL-C. No significant differences in changes in weight, BMI, central adiposity, fasting blood glucose, and systolic or diastolic blood pressure in any group. |
[50] | RCT cross over | Compare the effects of coconut oil, butter, and safflower oil on lipids and lipoproteins of moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects. |
13 men and 15 women with a plasma total cholesterol between 5.5 and 7.9 mmol/L and plasma triacylglycerols (TAG) less than 3 mmol/L consumed 50% of fat from butter, coconut oil, or safflower oil |
Coconut oil and butter diets increased TC and LDL-C compared to safflower oil; the levels of both were significantly lower in the coconut oil than on the butter diet. |
[51] | Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | A systematic review of the effect of coconut oil consumption on blood lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors compared with other cooking oils using data from clinical trials. | 16 articles included in the meta-analysis | Coconut oil increased LDL-cholesterol by 10.47 mg/dL and HDL-cholesterol by 4.00 mg/dL compared with nontropical vegetable oils. Coconut oil consumption did not significantly affect markers of glycemia, inflammation, and adiposity as compared with nontropical vegetable oils. |
[52] | Systematic Review and Network meta-Analysis | Compare the effects of different oils/solid fats on blood lipids. | 54 RCTs 2065 subjects included | Safflower oil ↓ in TC and LDL-C the most, followed by rapeseed oil and sunflower oil; soybean oil was the most effective oil to ↓ TG, followed by corn oil and palm oil; butter and lard were ranked worst for TC and LDL-C reduction; coconut oil was ranked best to ↑ HDL-C, followed by palm oil and beef fat. The NMA showed that all vegetable oils were more effective in reducing TC and LDL-C compared with butter. |