Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;9(12):1874. doi: 10.3390/foods9121874

Table 6.

Interactions means ± SE for the effects of grape type and year on the dry matter and juice sugar content, antioxidant activity (DPPH and TEAC) and anthocyanin content and in table grapes.

Parameter Factor 1 Factor 2
Year
Grape Type 2015 2016
Dry matter content
(%)
White 18.7 ± 0.3 a A 18.6 ± 0.5 a B
Red 19.8 ± 0.2 b A 21.6 ± 0.6 a A
Black 18.6 ± 0.5 a A 18.4 ± 0.5 a B
Antioxidant activity
(DPPH, µmol TE g−1)
White 127 ± 6.5 a A 60 ± 3.5 a B
Red 110 ± 4.3 b B 140 ± 1.2 a A
Black 63 ± 2.2 a C 132 ± 2.5 a A
Antioxidant activity
(TEAC, µmol TE g−1)
White 10.1 ± 0.8 a B 2.8 ± 0.2 b B
Red 9.4 ± 0.7 a B 5.8 ± 0.3 b A
Black 18.6 ± 1.7 a A 5.9 ± 0.5 b A
Anthocyanin content
(mg cyan kg−1)
White 12 ± 1 a C 15 ± 1 a C
Red 81 ± 10 a B 139 ± 27 a B
Black 462 ± 61 b A 642 ± 50 a A
Anthocyanin content
(mg mal kg−1)
White 12 ± 1 a C 16 ± 1 a C
Red 86 ± 10 a B 147 ± 28 a B
Black 487 ± 65 b A 677 ± 52 a A

TE, Trolox equivalent; cyan, cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalent; mal, malvidin 3-glucoside equivalent; For each parameter assessed means labeled with the same lower case letter within the same row and same capital letters within the same column are not significantly different (General Linear Hypothesis test p < 0.05).