Table 3.
Analysis results for the emotional Attention, Clarity, Repair dimensions according to the course of the students.
Course | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1st ESO * n = 86 |
2nd ESO * n = 80 |
3rd ESO * n = 86 |
4th ESO * n = 81 |
||||||||
f | % (IC) | f | % (IC) | f | % (IC) | f | % (IC) | χ2 | p | Tau-c | |
Attention | 4.633 | 0.592 | 0.015 | ||||||||
Insufficient | 24 | 27.9% | 17 | 21.3% | 24 | 27.9% | 18 | 22.2% | |||
(18.37–37.43) | (12.27–30.33) | (18.37–37.43) | (13.09–31.31) | ||||||||
Adequate | 45 | 52.3% | 49 | 61.3% | 41 | 47.7% | 49 | 60.5% | |||
(41.68–62.92) | (50.56–72.04) | (37.08–58.32) | (49.79–71.21) | ||||||||
Excessive | 17 | 19.8% | 14 | 17.5% | 21 | 24.4% | 14 | 17.3% | |||
(11.33–28.27) | (9.12–25.88) | (15.27–33.53) | (9.01–25.59) | ||||||||
Clarity | 7.723 | 0.259 | −0.109 | ||||||||
To improve | 30 | 34.9% | 25 | 31.3% | 40 | 46.5% | 38 | 46.9% | |||
(24.77–45.03) | (21.07–41.53) | (35.90–57.10) | (35.96–57.84) | ||||||||
Adequate | 45 | 52.3% | 47 | 58.8% | 40 | 46.5% | 37 | 45.7% | |||
(41.68–62.92) | (47.95–69.65) | (35.90–57.10) | (34.78–56.62) | ||||||||
Excellent | 11 | 12.8% | 8 | 10.0% | 6 | 7.0% | 6 | 7.4% | |||
(5.70–19.90) | (3.38–16.62) | (1.58–12.42) | (1.66–13.14) | ||||||||
Repair | 9.646 | 0.140 | −0.071 | ||||||||
To improve | 23 | 26.7% | 15 | 18.8% | 21 | 24.4% | 22 | 27.2% | |||
(17.30–36.10) | (10.18–27.42) | (15.27–33.53) | (17.45–36.95) | ||||||||
Adequate | 49 | 57.0% | 54 | 67.5% | 57 | 66.3% | 56 | 69.1% | |||
(46.48–67.52) | (57.17–77.83) | (56.25–76.35) | (58.97–79.23) | ||||||||
Excellent | 14 | 16.3% | 11 | 13.8% | 8 | 3.7% | 3 | 3.7% | |||
(8.45–24.15) | (6.19–21.41) | (0–7.71) | (0–7.84) |
* ESO: Compulsory Secondary Education.