Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 20;7(12):310. doi: 10.3390/children7120310

Table 3.

Analysis results for the emotional Attention, Clarity, Repair dimensions according to the course of the students.

Course
1st ESO *
n = 86
2nd ESO *
n = 80
3rd ESO *
n = 86
4th ESO *
n = 81
f % (IC) f % (IC) f % (IC) f % (IC) χ2 p Tau-c
Attention 4.633 0.592 0.015
Insufficient 24 27.9% 17 21.3% 24 27.9% 18 22.2%
(18.37–37.43) (12.27–30.33) (18.37–37.43) (13.09–31.31)
Adequate 45 52.3% 49 61.3% 41 47.7% 49 60.5%
(41.68–62.92) (50.56–72.04) (37.08–58.32) (49.79–71.21)
Excessive 17 19.8% 14 17.5% 21 24.4% 14 17.3%
(11.33–28.27) (9.12–25.88) (15.27–33.53) (9.01–25.59)
Clarity 7.723 0.259 −0.109
To improve 30 34.9% 25 31.3% 40 46.5% 38 46.9%
(24.77–45.03) (21.07–41.53) (35.90–57.10) (35.96–57.84)
Adequate 45 52.3% 47 58.8% 40 46.5% 37 45.7%
(41.68–62.92) (47.95–69.65) (35.90–57.10) (34.78–56.62)
Excellent 11 12.8% 8 10.0% 6 7.0% 6 7.4%
(5.70–19.90) (3.38–16.62) (1.58–12.42) (1.66–13.14)
Repair 9.646 0.140 −0.071
To improve 23 26.7% 15 18.8% 21 24.4% 22 27.2%
(17.30–36.10) (10.18–27.42) (15.27–33.53) (17.45–36.95)
Adequate 49 57.0% 54 67.5% 57 66.3% 56 69.1%
(46.48–67.52) (57.17–77.83) (56.25–76.35) (58.97–79.23)
Excellent 14 16.3% 11 13.8% 8 3.7% 3 3.7%
(8.45–24.15) (6.19–21.41) (0–7.71) (0–7.84)

* ESO: Compulsory Secondary Education.