Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;9(6):721–733. doi: 10.1159/000507887

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study population (n = 896)

Patients
Age, yearsa 53.8±6.3
Male 760 (84.8)
Etiology of liver disease
 Hepatitis B 786 (87.7)
 Hepatitis C 49 (5.5)
 Alcohol 38 (4.2)
 Others 23 (2.6)
Child-Pugh classification
 Class A 354 (39.5)
 Class B 339 (37.8)
 Class C 203 (22.7)
MELD scoreb 11 (8–16)
Last AFP before LT, ng/mLb 10.9 (4.4–53.7)
Tumor characteristics on pretransplant imaging
 Diameter of the largest viable tumora 1.6±1.6
 Viable tumor,a 1.4±2.6
PET n = 781
 Positivity 216 (27.7)
Types of LT
 DDLT 67 (7.5)
 LDLT 829 (92.5)
Primary LT (treatment-naïve HCC) 208 (23.2)
LT after treatment n = 688
 Types of treatment
  cTACE alone 409 (59.4)
  RFA alone 50 (7.3)
  Resection alone 13 (1.9)
  Radiation alone 5 (0.7)
  Combination 211 (30.7)
 Radiologic complete response after treatment 323 (46.9)
Tumor characteristics on pathology n = 706
 Edmondson grade
  I or II 293 (41.5)
  III or IV 413 (58.5)
 MVI 111 (15.7)
 Satellite nodule 67 (9.5)
Interval from initial HCC diagnosis to LT, monthsb 9 (3–28)

Unless otherwise indicated, data represent number of patients with percentage in parentheses. MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; LT, liver transplantation; PET, positron emission tomography; DDLT, deceased donor liver transplantation; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; cTACE, conventional transarterial chemoembolization; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; MVI, microvascular invasion.

a

Data are mean±standard deviation.

b

Data are median with interquartile ranges in parentheses.