Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 23;14:1753466620981863. doi: 10.1177/1753466620981863

Table 2.

Basic diagnostic data extracted from the five articles included in the quantitative analysis.

Study ID No. of case/control miRNA Level Sample Diagnostic power
TP FP FN TN DOR Sen Spe
Rodrigo-Muñoz et al.55a 138/39 miR-320a Serum 130 19 8 20 21.95 0.941 0.514
Rodrigo-Muñoz et al.55b 138/39 miR-185-5p Serum 123 9 15 30 32.5 0.89 0.8
Rodrigo-Muñoz et al.55c 138/39 miR-144-5p Serum 81 9 57 30 24.73 0.587 0.774
Rodrigo-Muñoz et al.55d 138/39 miR-1246 Serum 68 5 70 34 24.14 0.496 0.865
Karam and Abd Elrahman61a 100/100 miR-155 Plasma 80 11 20 89 33.04 0.8 0.89
Karam and Abd Elrahman61b 100/100 Let-7a Plasma 85 10 15 90 85 0.85 0.9
Elbehidy et al.92 95/80 miR-21 Serum 88 18 7 62 45.55 0.93 0.78
Wu et al.53 53/47 miR-1165-3p Serum 44 7 9 15 10.83 0.83 0.69
ElKashef et al.51a 30/30 miR-21 Serum 30 2 0 29 NA 1 0.95
ElKashef et al.51b 30/30 miR-155 Serum 30 0 0 30 NA 1 1
a, b, c, d

Independent study from the same article.

TP, true positive; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; TN, true negative; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity