The choice of gender to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in transgender persons may have a profound impact on clinical decision making and care [1]. However, few physicians are aware of this fact. In gender- and creatinine-based eGFR equations, gender is a surrogate for muscle mass [2]. Thus, even though there are no official guidelines to deal with the issue, it seems reasonable to choose the gender in the equation based on the individual’s actual muscle mass rather than on the current administrative or self-identity gender, or better still, to measure GFR in clinical situations where a precise value is required [3]. In this regard, transgender female creatinine values resemble male ones [4]. We report a 40-year-old female referred to nephrology for a sudden ‘decrease’ in eGFR that could be traced to the gender change in administrative records. Over recent years her serum creatinine had ranged from 0.90 to 1.03 mg/dL and eGFR from 100 to 112 mL/min/1.73 m2. However, in April 2019, serum creatinine was 0.93 mg/dL but, surprisingly, eGFR had dropped to 77 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (Figure 1). Discussion of the issue with the patient disclosed that she was a transgender female and had been on hormone therapy (cyproterone and estradiol) for 10 years, although this was not reflected in the electronic clinical records. A recent change in gender in the hospital administrative records resulted in a change in the automated equation to calculate eGFR from male to female. Indeed, the CKD-EPI ‘male’ eGFR remained stable at 103 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 24-h creatinine clearance was 122 mL/min. The topic of GFR estimation in transgender persons is not addressed in recent guidelines [5], and the lack of understanding by primary care physicians or specialists of the issues involved may potentially lead to unnecessary and even potentially invasive diagnostic procedures. A closer integration of the administrative, clinical biochemistry and clinical levels of care may decrease the possibility of harm by creating physician alerts triggered by recent changes in gender in administrative records, which provide information on potential biochemical implications.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Whitley CT, Greene DN. Transgender man being evaluated for a kidney transplant. Clin Chem 2017; 63: 1680–1683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 604–612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Delanaye P, Melsom T, Ebert N et al. Iohexol plasma clearance for measuring glomerular filtration rate in clinical practice and research: a review. Part 2: Why to measure glomerular filtration rate with iohexol? Clin Kidney J 2016; 9: 700–704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Roberts TK, Kraft CS, French D et al. Interpreting laboratory results in transgender patients on hormone therapy. Am J Med 2014; 127: 159–162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Telfer MM, Tollit MA, Pace CC et al. Australian standards of care and treatment guidelines for transgender and gender diverse children and adolescents. Med J Aust 2018; 209: 132–136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]