Table 3.
Comparison of relative abundance of urinary microbiome between NR group and RE group at all taxonomic levels.
| Taxa | NR | RE | p-value | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phylum | Firmicutes | 37.67 | 28.26 | 0.59 | 1.00 |
| Proteobacteria | 25.75 | 10.23 | 0.02 | 0.53 | |
| Actinobacteria | 6.69 | 6.69 | 0.95 | 1.00 | |
| Bacteroidetes | 6.37 | 5.81 | 0.89 | 1.00 | |
| Class | Bacilli | 28.67 | 25.39 | 0.89 | 1.00 |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 20.13 | 7.34 | 0.01 | 0.53 | |
| Actinobacteria | 5.79 | 6.45 | 0.93 | 1.00 | |
| Bacteroidia | 5.78 | 5.18 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |
| Clostridia | 3.19 | 2.29 | 0.83 | 1.00 | |
| Order | Bacillales | 8.87 | 14.17 | 0.78 | 1.00 |
| Lactobacillales | 19.72 | 11.19 | 0.31 | 0.83 | |
| Corynebacteriales | 2.70 | 5.49 | 0.74 | 1.00 | |
| Bacteroidales | 5.77 | 5.18 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |
| Pseudomonadales | 6.70 | 2.64 | 0.09 | 0.63 | |
| Enterobacteriales | 11.24 | 2.21 | 0.03 | 0.63 | |
| Family | Staphylococcaceae | 5.42 | 12.15 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Streptococcaceae | 10.39 | 9.05 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |
| Corynebacteriaceae | 2.54 | 5.39 | 0.76 | 1.00 | |
| Prevotellaceae | 4.82 | 5.08 | 0.97 | 1.00 | |
| Lactobacillaceae | 5.60 | 0.04 | 0.64 | 0.99 | |
| Genus | Staphylococcus | 5.17 | 11.89 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
| Streptococcus | 10.31 | 8.74 | 0.94 | 1.00 | |
| Prevotella | 4.13 | 4.96 | 0.95 | 1.00 | |
| Corynebacterium_1 | 1.64 | 4.54 | 0.80 | 1.00 | |
| Lactobacillus | 5.44 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.90 |
Data were reported as mean percentage; FDR, P-value after false discovery rate adjustment.