Table 4.
Differences on cannabis outcomes by gender and medical cannabis card status
| Money Spent | # of products | # of times used/day | Quantity of flower/buds | CUDIT | Solitary Use | Consequences | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 62.39 p<.01 | 3.48 p<.01 | 2.87 p<.01 | 0.92 p<.01 | 2.03 p<.01 | 0.73 p<.01 | 2.67 p<.01 |
| Female | 45.70* p=.01 | 2.96* p<.01 | 2.05* p<.01 | 0.68* p<.01 | 1.23* p<.01 | 0.60* p<.01 | 2.21* p=.02 |
| MC card | |||||||
| No | 41.86 p<.01 | 3.02 p<.01 | 2.24 p<.01 | 0.72 p<.01 | 1.48 p<.01 | 0.61 p<.01 | 2.34 p<.01 |
| Yes | 107.27* p<.01 | 4.15* p<.01 | 3.67* p<.01 | 1.18* p<.01 | 2.43 p<.01 | 0.91* p<.01 | 2.86* p=.03 |
| Race/Ethnicity | |||||||
| White | 50.67 p<.01 | 3.02 p<.01 | 2.46 p<.01 | 0.70 p<.01 | 1.71 p<.01 | 0.71 p<.01 | 2.47 p<.01 |
| Black | 105.05* p<.01 | 3.95* p=.04 | 2.52 p=.91 | 1.01 p=.13 | 2.43 p=.22 | 0.86 p=.17 | 2.81 p=.58 |
| Hispanic | 60.33 p=.24 | 3.49* p=.01 | 2.490 p=.92 | 0.90* p=.01 | 1.55 p=.48 | 0.66 p=.23 | 2.17 p=.20 |
| Asian | 40.81 p=.36 | 2.75 p=.25 | 2.63 p=.53 | 0.74 p=.74 | 1.71 p=.99 | 0.62 p=.11 | 2.85 p=.23 |
| Other | 47.81 p=.81 | 3.15 p=.60 | 2.38 p=.78 | 0.67 p=.78 | 1.63 p=.80 | 0.65 p=.32 | 2.73 p=.47 |
Note. Estimates are computed from regression model coefficients. Coefficients denoted (*) reflect significant differences (p<.05) between groups. Statistical significance (p-value) is also presented for the reference groups (i.e., intercept) to indicate whether the estimate is significantly different from zero.