Table 5.
Differences on cannabis outcomes by purchasing patterns
| Money Spent | # of products | # of times used/day | Quantity of flower/buds | CUDIT | Solitary Use | Consequences | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | |||||||
| Intercept | 22.98 p<.01 | 2.21 p<.01 | 2.22 p<.01 | 0.52 p<.01 | 0.21 p=.29 | 0.38 p<.01 | 1.43 p<.01 |
| Total Sources Types# | 21.29* p<.01 | 0.69* p<.01 | 0.57* p<.01 | 0.19* p<.01 | 0.98* p<.01 | 0.20* p<.01 | 0.68* p<.01 |
| Model 2 | |||||||
| Family/Friend (ref) | 22.12 p<.01 | 2.35 p<.01 | 1.85 p<.01 | 0.55 p<.01 | 0.69 p<.01 | 0.39 p<.01 | 1.85 p<.01 |
| Medical Cannabis Dispensary | 66.59 p<.01 | 3.74* p<.01 | 2.87* p<.01 | 0.96* p<.01 | 2.03* p<.01 | 0.68* p<.01 | 2.45* p<.01 |
| Recreational Cannabis Retailer | 50.34 p<.01 | 3.04* p<.01 | 2.30* p<.01 | 0.72* p=.01 | 1.48* p<.01 | 0.69* p<.01 | 2.37* p<.01 |
| Stranger/Dealer | 49.03 p=.06 | 2.81 p=.12 | 2.76* p<.01 | 0.74 p=.15 | 2.06* p<.01 | 0.56* p=.01 | 3.35* p<.01 |
Note. Model 1 coefficients are estimates from regression with slopes denoted (#). Model 2 are actual proportions for each group computed from regression coefficients. Significant differences in Model 2 reflect differences with the reference group (i.e., Family/Friend source of cannabis). All significant effects are at p<.05 and denoted (*). Statistical significance (p-value) is also presented for the reference groups (i.e., intercept) to indicate whether the estimate is significantly different from zero.