Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 13;3(4):e1124. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1124

TABLE 4.

Relative gene expression in L4‐6 DRGs and lumbar SCDH from mice at specified age. P‐values are based on Dunnett's post‐hoc test. Raw Ct value of Gapdh included in last column

Relative gene expression to Gapdh (S.E.M)n = 5–8 per cohort P‐value
Tissue Gene 12 months 18 months 24 months 12 vs 24 18 vs 24
Nociception DRG Calca 0.549 (0.083) 0.952 (0.189) 1.067 (0.207) 0.0747 0.8455
SCDH Calca 0.071 (0.009) 0.104 (0.022) 0.163 (0.0388) 0.0543 0.2410
SCDH Ramp1 0.033 (6.51×10−3) 0.065 (3.52×10−2) 0.091 (3.22×10−2) 0.2796 0.7445
DRG Tac1 3.05×10−4 (1.22×10−4) 8.43×10−4 (3.22×10−4) 5.61×10−4 (4.31×10−4) 0.7883 0.4855
SCDH Tac1 4.96 ×10−3 (1.48×10−3) 6.×10−3 (8.15×10−3) 8.15×10−3 (2.74×10−3) 0.6308 0.8107
SCDH Tacr1 9.30 ×10−3 (4.71×10−3) 7.06×10−3 (2.75×10−3) 4.55×10−3 (2.85×10−3) 0.5561 0.8387
Cold DRG Trpa1 0.012 (2.31×10−2) 0.025 (7.26×10−2) 0.026 (4.87×10−2) 0.1037 0.9590
Inflammation DRG Nfkb1 3.03 ×10−3 (×10−3) 3.99×10−3 (5.70×10−4) 8.31×10−3 (9.21×10−4) 0.0002 0.0016
DRG Rela 0.030 (3.33×10−3) 0.048 (7.80×10−3) 0.059 (0.010) 0.0239 0.4908
DRG Il1b 1.21 ×10−3 (4.80×10−4) 5.95×10−4 (1.38×10−4) 1.31×10−3 (1.78×10−4) 0.9997 0.5542
DRG Il6 5.79 ×10−5 (1.72×10−5) 4.81×10−5 (2.10×10−5) 1.03×10−4 (3.73×10−5) 0.2117 0.0636
DRG Tnf 2.29 ×10−10 (4.75×10−11) 4.74×10−10 (1.65×10−10) 2.05×10−10 (1.95×10−11) 0.9755 0.2230
DRG Gfap 5.01 ×10−3 (1.03×10−3) 7.90×10−3 (4.17×10−4) 5.24×10−3 (1.59×10−3) 0.9899 0.3401
DRG Cox 1.52 (0.178) 2.24 (0.307) 1.67 (0.185) 0.8906 0.5123
Nerve injury DRG Atf3 2.11 ×10−3 (4.84×10−4) 3.81×10−3 (7.23×10−4) 5.99×10−3 (8.23×10−4) 0.0030 0.0835
DRG Npy 3.81 ×10−4 (1.19×10−4) 8.95×10−4 (2.67×10−4) 8.10×10−3 (9.13×10−5) 0.0567 0.8661
Nerve growth DRG Bdnf 5.18 ×10−4 (1.05×10−4) 9.14×10−4 (1.98×10−4) 1.20×10−3 (2.35×10−4) 0.0437 0.4948
Ct of Gapdh DRG Gapdh 23.47 (0.4380) 23.47 (0.5712) 23.25 (0.5931) 0.9999 0.9999