Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;16(1):380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.08.010

Table 1.

Participant characteristics.

Overall
Men
Women
P value
n = 644
n = 267
n = 377
Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3)
Age (years) 75 (70, 80) 75 (70, 79) 76 (71, 80) 0.056∗
ΔE value 41.8 (36.8, 47.2) 43.8 (38.7, 48.5) 41.0 (35.9, 46) <0.001∗
a∗ value 18.1 (14.4, 22.3) 19.6 (15.7, 23.1) 17.5 (13.6, 21.5) <0.001∗
10 Color Shades 7 (5, 8) 7 (6, 8) 6 (5, 8) <0.001∗
5 Color Scales 3 (3, 4) 4 (3, 4) 3 (3, 4) <0.001∗
Number of present teeth 18 (6, 25) 19 (6, 25) 17 (5, 24) 0.104∗
Number of artificial teeth 6 (0, 22) 5 (0, 20) 7 (0, 22) 0.294∗
Number of functional teeth 28 (27, 28) 28 (27, 28) 28 (27, 28) 0.112∗
Oral moisture score 28.5 (26.8, 29.8) 28.5 (27.1, 29.8) 28.5 (26.7, 29.8) 0.680∗

n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
P value

Eichner index A 177 (27.9) 80 (30.5) 97 (26.1) 0.414∗∗
B 232 (36.6) 95 (36.3) 137 (36.8)
C 225 (35.5) 87 (33.2) 138 (37.1)
Removable denture use Yes 392 (61.0) 158 (59.4) 234 (62.1) 0.494∗∗
Subjective symptoms of dry mouth Yes 200 (31.1) 56 (21.0) 144 (38.2) <0.001∗∗

Q1: First quartile, Q3: Third quartile.

∗: Mann–Whitney U test.

∗∗: Chi-squared test.

The results of the four evaluation methods for chewing gum color change all showed significant differences between men and women.