Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;16(1):380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.08.010

Table 2.

Values of the evaluation items for the different age groups.

Years 65–69
70–74
75–79
80–84
≥85
P value
n = 137
n = 155
n = 189
n = 111
n = 52
Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3)
Age (years) 68 (66, 69) 72 (71, 74) 77 (76, 78) 82 (81, 83) 88 (86, 90)
ΔE value 44.3 (37.4, 48.4) 43.9 (38, 49) 40.5 (35.9, 45.6) 41.4 (37.9, 46.5) 38.2 (34.0, 43.5) <0.001
a∗ value 19.6 (14.7, 23.0) 19.9 (15.5, 23.3) 17.3 (13.6, 21.0) 18.0 (15.2, 21.6) 16.5 (13.2, 19.9) 0.001
10 Color Shades 7 (6, 8) 7 (6, 8) 6 (5, 8) 7 (6, 8) 6 (5, 8) 0.005
5 Color Scales 4 (3, 4) 4 (3, 4) 3 (3, 4) 3 (3, 4) 3 (2, 4) 0.006
Number of present teeth 22 (17, 27) 21 (12, 25) 15 (4, 24) 9 (0, 24) 3.5 (0, 13)
Number of artificial teeth 0 (0, 8) 2 (0, 14) 11 (0, 23) 17 (0, 28) 24 (14, 28)
Number of functional teeth 27 (26, 28) 28 (26, 28) 28 (27, 28) 28 (27, 28) 28 (28, 28)
Oral moisture score
28.6 (26.9, 29.8)
28.9 (27.1, 30.0)
28.3 (26.7, 29.7)
28.7 (27.7, 29.6)
28.0 (25.9, 29.6)


n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)

Subjective symptoms of dry mouth 38 (27.7) 44 (28.4) 64 (33.9) 38 (34.2) 16 (30.8)

Q1: First quartile, Q3: Third quartile.

Jonckheere–Terpstra test; Bonferroni corrected P value, P < 0.0125.

All four evaluation methods for color-changeable chewing gum showed decreased values with increased age.