Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;16(1):380–388. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.08.010

Table 3.

Values of the evaluation items for the different age groups among men.

Years 65–69
70–74
75–79
80–84
≥85
P value
n = 66
n = 67
n = 70
n = 44
n = 20
Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3) Median (Q1, Q3)
Age (years) 68 (66, 69) 72 (71, 73) 77 (76, 78) 82 (81, 83) 88 (85, 92)
ΔE value 45.3 (40.5, 49.5) 45.3 (38.7, 49.1) 42.7 (37.1, 47.3) 43.8 (39.7, 48.1) 38.8 (34.1, 46.8) 0.033
a∗ value 20.3 (17.0, 23.6) 21.0 (15.9, 23.4) 18.5 (14.3, 22.1) 19.5 (16.4, 23.5) 16.1 (11.7, 22.6) 0.061
10 Color Shades 7 (6, 8) 7 (6, 8) 7 (6, 8) 7 (6, 8) 7 (4, 8) 0.097
5 Color Scales 4 (3, 4) 4 (3, 4) 3 (3, 4) 4 (3, 4) 3 (2, 4) 0.080
Number of present teeth 23 (12, 27) 21 (12, 25) 16 (2, 25) 13 (2, 25) 6 (0, 15)
Number of artificial teeth 0 (0, 13) 2 (0, 13) 11 (0, 23) 14 (0, 26) 20 (2, 28)
Number of functional teeth 28 (26, 28) 28 (26, 28) 28 (27, 28) 28 (27, 28) 28 (26, 28)
Oral moisture score
28.6 (27.0, 29.7)
28.9 (27.2, 30.0)
28.4 (27.0, 29.7)
28.9 (27.9, 30.0)
26.4 (23.9, 29.5)


n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)

Subjective symptoms of dry mouth 11 (16.7) 11 (16.4) 20 (28.6) 8 (18.2) 6 (30.0)

Q1: First quartile, Q3: Third quartile.

Jonckheere–Terpstra test; Bonferroni corrected P value, P < 0.0125.

When the results of the four evaluation methods for chewing gum color change were examined according to age and sex, there was no age-related decrease in masticatory performance in men.