Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec;21(8):602–609. doi: 10.2174/1389202921999200625220812

Table 1.

Comparison between 10x genomics and BD rhapsody.

Items 10x Genomics BD Rhapsody
Library Costs $ 1600 $ 1400
Time Costs ~8 hours ~10 hours
Reproducibility Pretty good good
Cell viability demand >80% >50%
Cells loading 500-25000 2000-40000
Cells recovery 100-16000 100-25000
Safe stop points 5 4
Single cell isolation Microfluidics Nanowells
Cell Surface Protein yes yes
Single Cell VDJ yes yes
Single Cell ATAC yes no
RNA capture beads Gel beads Magnetic beads
Second strand cDNA synthesis TSO RPE
Full-length cDNA yes no
Advantage High throughput
Easy operation
High cell recovery
Monitor cells viability with imaging system
Fewer doublets
Limitations Fresh samples needed
Detect only 10% mRNA
Fresh samples needed
More hands work
More cells input
One sample per assay

(median: over 1000), while 10x 3’ V3 ranges from 1000 to nearly 4000 per cell (median: around 2000) with each cell capturing around 2500 RNA molecules or 5000, respectively. The median mitochondrial genes percentile for BD methods is a little bit more than 10x, while 10x delivers the range of mitochondrial genes percentile from 5 to 15. This result indicates that due to different capture mechanisms, the BD system could tolerate less cell viability, while 10x scRNASeq clearly delivers a better RNA capture rate. Therefore, the BD system might be better for a less accessible patient sample. As for cell type capture capability, there is not much difference as indicated in Fig. (4). Both methods could capture lymphocytes, myeloid cells and granulocytes well.