Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Apr 4;27(1):196–202. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07333-8

TABLE 1.

Patient and tumor characteristics

Variable Overall (n = 63) rPLND (n = 22) oPLND (n = 41) p value
Age, median (IQR) 65 (53–75) 64 (52–74.8) 65 (53–75) 0.79
Sex [n (%)]
 Male 23 (36.5) 9 (40.9) 14 (34.1) 0.8
 Female 40 (63.5) 13 (59.1) 27 (65.9)
BMI [median (IQR)] 29.1 (25.9–32) 26.8 (22.3–31.8) 29.3 (26.7–32.1) 0.26
Location of primary tumor [n (%)]
 Unknown 9 (14.3) 3 (13.6) 6 (14.6) 0.99
 Buttock/flank 11 (17.5) 4 (18.2) 7 (17.1)
 Lower extremity 43 (68.2) 15 (68.2) 28 (68.2)
Breslow depth of primary tumor [mm; median (IQR)] 3.5 (1.6–5.2) 3.5 (2.4–5.5) 3.5 (1.5–5.0) 0.63
Systemic therapy before PLND [n (%)] 18 (28.6) 7 (31.8) 11 (26.8) 0.9
Systemic therapy after PLND [n (%)] 40 (63.5) 12 (54.5) 28 (63.8) 0.42
Indication for pelvic lymph node dissection [n (%)] 0.04
 Radiographic evidence/biopsy proven pelvic disease 48 (76.2) 14 (63.6) 34 (82.9)
 Pelvic drainage on SLNB (not sampled) in setting of positive inguinal SLN 9 (14.3) 6 (27.3) 3 (7.3)
 Involvement of 3 or more positive inguinal nodes 4 (6.3) 2 (9.1) 2 (4.9)
 Large (> 3 cm) positive groin disease 2 (3.2) 0 2 (4.9)

rPLND robotic pelvic lymph node dissection; oPLND open pelvic lymph node dissection; IQR interquartile range; BMI body mass index; PLND pelvic lymph node dissection; SLNB sentinel lymph node biopsy; SLN sentinel lymph node