Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 15;2020:8822308. doi: 10.1155/2020/8822308

Table 2.

Differences and similarities with respect to criteria and definitions between the SYNTAX score and CatLet score.

Items Values
Calculators CatLet score SYNTAX score
1. Underlying mechanism Weighted matrix# Leaman score
2. Dominance selection
 RCA dominance 6 types 2 types
 Dx size 3 types NA
 LAD length 3 types NA
3. Lesion definition As in the SYNTAX ≥50% diameter stenosis on vessels >1.5 mm
4. Multiplication factor As in the SYNTAX 5.0 for occlusion
2.0 for nonocclusion
5. Lesion types 6 types 2 types
 Native nonocclusion (50–99% diameter reduction) Yes Yes
 Native acute total occlusion (ATO) Yes Yes
 Native chronic total occlusion (CTO) Yes Yes
 In-stent nonocclusion Yes NA
 In-stent ATO Yes NA
 In-stent CTO Yes NA
6. Scoring modification Yes if appropriate No
7. Culprit vessels Indicated No
8. Trifurcation Yes/no Scored
9. Bifurcation Yes/no Scored
10. Aorta ostial lesion Yes/no Scored
11. Severe tortuosity Yes/no Scored
12. Length >20 mm Yes/no Scored
13. Heavy calcification Yes/no Scored
16. Thrombus Yes/no Scored
17. Diffuse disease/small vessels Discarded Scored

Notes: CatLet = Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion; SYNTAX = Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery; RCA = right coronary artery; LAD = left anterior descending artery; Dx = diagonals; NA = not available. #See reference [16].