Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 18;7:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.01.006

Table 6.

Antimicrobial activity of different fractions of column chromatography of hydroalcoholic leaves extract of R. fruticosusagainst E. coli, H.influenzae, E.faecalisand S. aureus (diameter in mm).

Fraction nos. Conc. (μg\ml) E. coli H. influrnza E. faecalis S. aureus
1 250 nd nd nd nd
500 nd nd 6 ± 0.22 nd
1000 nd nd 8 ± 0.70 nd
2000 6 ± 0.15 nd nd nd
Ciprofloxacin 250 22 ± 0.12 25 ± 0.17 28 ± 0.12 25 ± 0.19
2 250 6 ± 0.17 6 ± 0.10 nd 6 ± 0.22
500 nd nd nd 6 ± 0.10
1000 nd nd nd 7 ± 0.85
2000 nd 6 ± 0.15 nd 7 ± 0.98
Ciprofloxacin 250 20 ± 0.44 25 ± 0.10 29 ± 0.16 27 ± 0.71
3 250 6 ± 0.54 nd 13 ± 0.19 6 ± 0.53
500 nd nd 17 ± 0.55 7 ± 0.34
1000 nd nd 18 ± 0.29 8 ± 0.20
2000 nd nd 20 ± 0.09 8 ± 0.32
Ciprofloxacin 500 20 ± 0.23 25 ± 0.18 26 ± 0.07 24 ± 0.18
4 250 nd 6 ± 0.19 16 ± 0.41 7 ± 0.30
500 nd 6 ± 0.31 19 ± 0.90 8 ± 0.12
1000 6 ± 0.10 6 ± 0.42 20 ± 0.13 10 ± 0.11
2000 6 ± 0.51 6 ± 0.92 16 ± 0.5 9 ± 0.15
Ciprofloxacin 250 25 ± 0.23 29 ± 0.11 24 ± 0.08 26 ± 0.10
DMSO 0 0 0 0

nd = not detectable.