Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;12(1):e12120. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12120

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics of the Nutrition, the Unrecognized Determinant in Alzheimer's Disease (NUDAD) study population

All SCD MCI AD
Baseline diagnosis No progression Progression No progression Progression No progression Progression No progression Progression
361 167 182 22 85 45 94 100
Age, years 63.65 ± 8.13 66.26 ± 8.39* 60.42 ± 7.45 62.61 ± 8.38 65.74 ± 7.34 66.85 ± 8.16 68.02 ± 7.44 66.79 ± 8.37
Female 166 (46) 78 (47) 86 (47) 9 (41) 34 (40) 19 (42) 46 (49) 50 (50)
Education (Verhage scale) 5 (5, 6) 5 (4, 6) 6 (5, 6) 6 (5, 6) 5 (5, 6) 5 (4, 6) 5 (5, 6) 5 (4, 6)
MMSE 27 (25, 29) 24 (21, 27)* 29 (27, 29) 29 (27, 29) 27 (25, 28) 26 (25, 28) 24 (22, 26) 22 (20, 24)*
APOE ε4 carrier a  173 (51) 102 (63)* 70 (41) 13 (62) 46 (56) 25 (60) 57 (66) 64 (65)
Follow‐up duration, years 2.17 ± 0.90 2.11 ± 0.82 2.18 ± 0.93 2.23 ± 0.79 2.28 ± 0.69 2.09 ± 0.90 2.04 ± 0.99 2.09 ± 0.79
BMI, kg/m2 26.24 ± 4.22 24.97 ± 3.86* 27.04 ± 4.72 25.79 ± 4.25 25.65 ± 3.72 24.99 ± 3.50 25.23 ± 3.24 24.77 ± 3.93
Smoker
Current 51 (14) 25 (15) 25 (14) 2 (9) 15 (18) 8 (18) 11 (12) 15 (15)
Former 141 (39) 62 (37) 69 (38) 13 (59) 31 (36) 17 (38) 41 (44) 32 (32)
No 169 (47) 80 (48) 88 (48) 7 (32) 39 (46) 20 (44) 42 (45) 53 (53)
Alcohol, glasses per day 0.5 (0.0, 2.0) 0.5 (0.0, 2.0) 0.5 (0.0, 1.4) 0.8 (0.0, 2.0) 0.5 (0.0, 2.0) 0.5 (0.0, 1.0) 0.5 (0.0, 1.9) 0.5 (0.0, 1.6)
Diabetes mellitus 35 (10) 13 (8) 11 (6) 3 (14) 15 (18) 2 (4) 9 (10) 8 (8)
Hypertension 131 (36) 51 (31) 64 (35) 6 (27) 33 (39) 16 (36) 34 (36) 29 (29)
Hypercholesterolemia 109 (30) 42 (25) 43 (24) 4 (18) 30 (35) 15 (33) 36 (38) 23 (23)*
Lipid‐lowering medication 98 (27) 35 (22) 39 (21) 2 (9) 25 (29) 13 (29) 34 (36) 21 (21)*
Amyloid positive b 143 (49) 110 (83)* 34 (24) 10 (69)* 37 (53) 26 (65) 72 (92) 73 (95)

Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer's disease; APOE, apolipoprotein E; BMI, body mass index; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IQR, interquartile range; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; PET, positron emission tomography; SCD, subjective cognitive decline; SD, standard deviation.

Notes: Data in mean ± SD, n(%), median (IQR), groups were compared on their outcome (stable vs progression) in the total cohort and within subgroups of their baseline syndrome diagnosis (SCD/MCI/AD). Education was rated using Verhage's scale ranging from 1 (low) to 7 (high). 52 *P <.05 values correspond to t‐test, χ2 test or Mann‐Whitney U tests when appropriate.

a

APOE genotype was available in 500 participants (95%).

b

Amyloid status (CSF or PET) was available in 423 (80%) participants.