Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 30.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2019 Apr;57(4):270–278. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001070

Table 4.

Risk Differences in Positive Care Experiences Associated with H-PACT Enrollment, Controlling for Site and Patient Covariates.

Enrolled
in H-PACT
(n=251)
Enrolled in
standard
primary care
(n=1,527)
Risk difference (RD)
Primary care domain % % RD 95% CI
 Access 56.2 35.0 21.1*** 11.2, 31.0
 Communication 71.8 58.7 13.1** 4.5, 21.7
 Office staff helpfulness/courtesy 63.6 51.3 12.3** 3.5, 21.0
 Provider rating 62.6 50.7 11.9* 2.4, 21.4
 Comprehensiveness 62.0 54.5 7.5 −1.6, 16.6
 Care coordination 65.8 57.2 8.6 −2.9, 20.1
 Self-management support 60.3 53.4 6.9 −2.7, 16.6
 Shared decision-making 51.8 41.7 10.2 −2.0, 22.3
*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***,

p<.001

Study sites included 25 VHA facilities with an H-PACT implemented by October 2013. % = Predicted probability of reporting positive healthcare experiences, calculated separately by primary care enrollment groups (H-PACT or standard primary care). Probabilities were estimated from logistic regression models predicting positive versus moderate/negative experiences with care. Models, run separately for each domain of care, controlled for patient sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, rural versus urban residence, period of service, physical and mental health ratings, clinical diagnoses, number of primary care visits, receipt of other VHA homeless services; and study site.