Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 28;13(24):2853–2864. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.002

Table 4.

Results of Survey of United States Pediatric/Congenital Interventional Cardiologists

Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree Missing
SAFETY
Adverse events 3% (5) 10% (15) 15% (21) 49% (71) 19% (28) 3% (5)
Mortality 5% (7) 9% (13) 10% (15) 45% (65) 28% (40) 3% (5)
Failure to rescue 2% (3) 6% (8) 10% (14) 46% (66) 34% (49) 3% (5)
Procedure specific AE 1% (2) 2% (3) 5% (7) 61% (89) 26% (38) 4% (6)
Very poor Poor Neutral Good Very good Missing
CURRENT RISK ADJUSTMENT 3% (5) 32% (46) 32% (46) 30% (43) 3% (5) 3% (5)
OTHER OUTCOMES
Procedure specific technical success rate 1% (2) 2% (3) 6% (9) 55% (80) 31% (45) 4% (6)
Femoral artery pulse loss 5% (7) 12% (18) 25% (36) 41% (60) 12% (17) 5% (7)
Radiation exposure 1% (1) 9% (13) 14% (21) 51% (74) 20% (29) 5% (7)
Patient satisfaction scores 3% (5) 16% (23) 33% (48) 35% (51) 8% (12) 4% (6)
HOSPITAL CHARACTERISTICS
Pediatric CT operative volume 3% (4) 14% (21) 21% (30) 45% (65) 12% (17) 6% (8)
ECMO program 1% (1) 5% (7) 8% (12) 43% (62) 38% (55) 6% (8)
Heart transplant program 7% (10) 20% (29) 26% (38) 34% (49) 8% (11) 6% (8)
Dedicated pediatric cardiac or CT surgical intensive care unit 3% (4) 9% (13) 10% (15) 43% (63) 28% (41) 6% (9)
Dedicated cardiac preparatory and recovery unit 3% (5) 13% (19) 21% (31) 37% (54) 19% (28) 6% (8)
PCCL LAB CHARACTERISTICS
Lab annual catheterization volume 3% (5) 16% (23) 19% (27) 41% (60) 14% (21) 6% (9)
Operator annual catheterization volume 4% (6) 13% (19) 22% (32) 41% (59) 14% (20) 6% (9)
Procedure specific annual volume 3% (5) 8% (12) 19% (27) 44% (64) 19% (27) 7% (10)
Individual operator experience (years) 4% (6) 13% (19) 22% (32) 41% (59) 14% (20) 6% (9)
Dedicated pediatric cardiac anesthesia 1% (1) 3% (4) 11% (16) 51% (74) 29% (42) 6% (8)
Participation in device trials 6% (8) 26% (37) 30% (43) 28% (41) 6% (8) 6% (8)
Average number of nurses and/or technologists staffing each case 2% (3) 12% (17) 30% (43) 48% (69) 3% (5) 6% (8)
Use of a scrub person in addition to trainee assistants 5% (7) 20% (29) 37% (53) 27% (39) 5% (7) 7% (10)
Specific ratio of registered nurses to technologists on staff 3% (4) 31% (45) 39% (56) 19% (27) 3% (4) 3% (4)
Presence of categorical cardiology fellows 10% (14) 30% (44) 45% (65) 8% (11) 2% (3) 6% (8)
Presence of advanced PCCL interventional fellow 7% (10) 30% (44) 38% (55) 17% (25) 2% (3) 6% (8)
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES
C3PO participation 6% (9) 19% (28) 34% (50) 32% (47) 2% (3) 6% (8)
IMPACT® participation 9% (13) 12% (17) 23% (34) 39% (57) 10% (15) 6% (9)
CCISC participation 8% (11) 13% (19) 40% (58) 32% (46) 2% (3) 6% (8)
Radiation exposure monitoring program 1% (1) 1% (2) 8% (12) 66% (95) 18% (26) 6% (9)
Femoral artery pulse loss program 1% (2) 4% (6) 28% (40) 52% (75) 10% (14) 6% (8)