Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Dent. 2020 Nov 15;42(6):470–475.

Table 4:

Multiple Regression Models for Temperament Domains and Presence of Any Carious Lesion, dmfs Count, and Timing of Caries Lesion Development.

CARIES EXPERIENCE (Yes/No) Caries (d3mfs > 0) Caries (d4mfs > 0) Caries (d5mfs > 0)
OR* (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value

Surgency 1.21 (0.77, 1.90) 0.410 1.21 (0.79, 1.88) 0.381 1.05 (0.65, 1.67) 0.847
Negative Affect 1.02 (0.91, 1.14) 0.761 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) 0.468 0.86 (0.74, 1.00) 0.055
Effortful Control 0.81 (0.62, 1.05) 0.115 0.79 (0.57, 1.09) 0.154 0.72 (0.47, 1.10) 0.126

CARIES EXPERIENCE (dmfs count) Surfaces (d3mfs***) Surfaces (d4mfs***) Surfaces (d5mfs***)
IRR** (95% CI) p-value IRR (95% CI) p-value IRR (95% CI) p-value
Surgency 1.77 (1.50, 2.09) < 0.001 1.80 (1.59, 2.04) < 0.001 1.12 (0.92, 1.35) 0.254
Negative Affect 1.31 (1.00, 1.71) 0.046 1.33 (1.05, 1.68) 0.018 1.50 (1.18, 1.92) 0.001
Effortful Control 0.61 (0.49, 0.75) < 0.001 0.58 (0.48, 0.71) < 0.001 1.04 (0.70, 1.56) 0.836

TIMING OF CARIES LESION DEVELOPMENT (early vs. late vs. none) Odds Ratio
(95% CI) p-value
Surgency 1.13 (0.67, 1.92) 0.642
Negative Affect 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) 0.808
Effortful Control 0.83 (0.83, 1.18) 0.293
*

OR=Odds Ratio.

**

IRR=Incidence Rate Ratio.

***

d3mfs, d4mfs, and d5mfs are dmfs scores calculated using ICDAS severity scores ≥ 3, ≥ 4, or ≥ 5 to define the decay portion of dmfs.

Covariates included in all models were Medicaid status, child race/ethnicity, frequency an adult brushes the child’s teeth, sleeping while nursing or while drinking something other than water from a bottle/sippy cup, frequency drinking tap water, frequency of sugary drinks, caregiver cavities/fillings/teeth pulled in last two years, frequency caregiver’s gums bleed while brushing.