Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2020 Nov 4;588(7837):350–354. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2875-7

Extended Data Table 1:

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics.

pH8-PAC pH4-PAC

Data collection and processing
Magnification 130,000 130,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300
Electron exposure (e−/Å2) 49.6 49.6
Defocus range (jun) −1.2 to−1.9 −1.2 to−1.9
Pixel size (Å) 1.026 1.026
Symmetry imposed C3 C3
Initial particle images (no.) 4,515,826 6,647,983
Final particle images (no.) 323,766 48,551
Map resolution (Å) 3.60 3.73
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3.60–246.2 3.73–246.2
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) De novo De novo
Model resolution (Å)
 FSC threshold 3.87 3.93
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −180.05 −148.66
Model composition
 Non-hydrogen atoms 6432 6573
 Protein residues 834 861
 Ligands 0 0
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.004 0.004
 Bond angles (°) 0.627 0.617
Validation
 MolProbity score 1.87 2.07
 Clashscore 11.12 16.75
 Poor rotamers (%) 0.00 0.00
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 95.65 95.09
 Allowed (%) 4.35 4.91
 Disallowed (%) 0.00 0.00