. 2020 Dec 30;20:103715. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103715

Table 2.

Sensitivity inspection of $R_{0}$ and optimal surveillance $J$ based on prevention strategies for weights $w_{4} = 200, φ_{1} = 100, φ_{2} = 20, φ_{3} = 150, φ_{4} = 300$ , $t \in [0, 30]$ and at different values of $α$ .

$α$	Intervention Strategies	$R_{0}$	J
0.8	$mm = 0, s d = 0, c h = 0, s c = 0$	2.08323	6171.69
	$mm = 0.3, s d = 0.5, c h = 0.65, s c = 0.9$	0.236717	9702.47
	$mm = 0.3, s d = 0.7, c h = 0.5, s c = 0.9$	0.227723	9068.92
	$mm = 0.6, s d = 0.5, c h = 0.3, s c = 0.9$	0.246215	9017.57
0.95	$mm = 0, s d = 0, c h = 0, s c = 0$	2.83546	9622.94
	$mm = 0.3, s d = 0.5, c h = 0.65, s c = 0.9$	0.266884	9724.52
	$mm = 0.3, s d = 0.7, c h = 0.5, s c = 0.9$	0.252657	9090.57
	$mm = 0.6, s d = 0.5, c h = 0.3, s c = 0.9$	0.278141	9040.02
1	$mm = 0, s d = 0, c h = 0, s c = 0$	3.17529	10815.9
	$mm = 0.3, s d = 0.5, c h = 0.65, s c = 0.9$	0.278141	9732.32
	$mm = 0.3, s d = 0.7, c h = 0.5, s c = 0.9$	0.266884	9098.23
	$mm = 0.6, s d = 0.5, c h = 0.3, s c = 0.9$	0.290079	9047.98