Table 2.
Top 5% variable importance results estimated by different methods.
| Variablea | Attention valueb/Effect sizec | ||
| Single attention model |
|
||
|
|
sm_presnt | 0.0615 | |
|
|
BD1 | 0.0519 | |
|
|
pa_walk | 0.0479 | |
|
|
HE_Upro | 0.0468 | |
|
|
HE_alt | 0.0430 | |
|
|
Npins | 0.0413 | |
| Multi-attention model |
|
||
|
|
HE_HB | 0.041 | |
|
|
Sex | 0.033 | |
|
|
Pa_walk | 0.032 | |
|
|
HE_HBsAg | 0.027 | |
|
|
Allownc | 0.026 | |
|
|
HE_sbp | 0.026 | |
| Single attention model with UAd |
|
||
|
|
pa_walk | 0.050 | |
|
|
BH9_11 | 0.017 | |
|
|
HE_THfh2 | 0.011 | |
|
|
HE_THfh1 | 0.010 | |
|
|
HE_THfh3 | 0.010 | |
|
|
DI5_dg | 0.010 | |
| Multi-attention model with UA |
|
||
|
|
pa_walk | 0.050 | |
|
|
HE_THfh2 | 0.019 | |
|
|
BH9_11 | 0.015 | |
|
|
HE_THfh1 | 0.013 | |
|
|
HE_ast | 0.010 | |
|
|
house | 0.010 | |
| Conventional statisticse |
|
||
|
|
age | 1.536 | |
|
|
HE_glu | 1.214 | |
|
|
HE_HbA1c | –1.014 | |
|
|
Wt_pool_1 | –0.516 | |
|
|
Wt_itvex | –0.516 | |
|
|
HE_Uglu | 0.319 | |
aSee Table A2 in Multimedia Appendix 1 for variable label descriptions.
bAverage from the 10 fold sets.
cEffect size is presented only for the conventional statistics.
dUA: uncertainty awareness.
eNull hypothesis of categorical variables=no relationships between diabetes and a categorical variable; null hypothesis of continuous variables=no difference in variables between the diabetes and no diabetes groups.