Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;11:554915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554915

Table 3.

Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (PEDro) of the included randomized controlled trials (acute exercises and chronic exercises).

Author [Reference] Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7 Item 8 Item 9 Item 10 Score
Benzing et al. (2016) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Pate (2015) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Gothe et al. (2013) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Chen et al. (2015) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Ellemberg and St-Louis-Deschênes (2010) 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Jager et al. (2015) 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 8
Kubesch et al. (2009) 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 8
Chun et al. (2015) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
Budde et al. (2010) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Yan et al. (2014) 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 7
Cooper et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Park and Etnier (2019) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Egger et al. (2018) Vera et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Vera et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Mean Score (acute exercises) 7.00
Chen et al. (2016) 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
De Greeff et al. (2016) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Kval et al. (2017) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Jiang (2015) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Xin (2012) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Budde et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 8
Purohit and Pradhan (2016) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5
Wang (2017) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Yin et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
Chaddock-Heyman et al. (2013) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Stroth et al. (2009) 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 5
Lina (2017) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Yan Jun and Chen (2013) 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 5
Keita et al. (2011) 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 6
Hillman et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 9
Telles et al. (2013) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10
Fisher et al. (2011) 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Tarp et al. (2016) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 5
Ludyga et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Nie (2019) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Egger et al. (2019) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Vera et al. (2018) 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Mean Score (chronic exercises) 6.77

Item 1 = eligibility criteria; Item 2 = randomization; Item 3 = concealed allocation; Item 4 = similar baseline; Item 5 = assessor blindness; Item 6 = subject blindness; Item 7 = a retention rate of 85% or above; Item 8 = comparison between groups; Item 9 = point measure and measures of variability; Item 10 = completeness of measurement results (“1” means that the corresponding item was explicitly described and present in details; “0” means that the corresponding item was absent, inadequately described, or unclear).