Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;75(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00265-020-02948-4

Table 6.

LMM output for female FCM level changes [z-ln (FCM concentration (ng/g))] in response to various ecological, physiological and social factors (comparison to control model [containing only ecological and physiological factors]: χ212,16 = 9.13, P = 0.06, ΔAIC = 1.13, N = 370 of 96 FPs; comparison to null model: χ23,16 = 16.09, P = 0.24, ΔAIC = 9.91). All fixed and control effects with P < 0.05 are indicated in bold. z, fixed effect variable was z-transformed prior to analysis; C, control factor; F, fixed effect

Type Estimate SE t P
Intercept − 0.193 0.390
Site (Suaq vs. Tuanan) C − 0.021 0.281 − 0.077 0.939
Consecutive days in association with female(s) F − 0.082 0.085 − 0.960 0.338
Consecutive days in association with male(s) F 0.136 0.047 2.870 0.004
Male-female cumulative aggression index F − 0.110 0.118 − 0.932 0.352
Female-female agonistic interactions (no vs. yes) F 0.063 0.443 0.142 0.887
Number of days followed C − 0.002 0.018 − 0.141 0.888
z Daily feeding proportion C − 0.072 0.054 − 1.325 0.186
z Age of dependent infant (years) C 0.007 0.121 0.059 0.953
z Fruit Availability Index C 0.057 0.076 0.739 0.462
Hour of sample collection C 0.004 0.025 0.151 0.880
z Days to sample extraction C 0.067 0.082 0.812 0.419
Laboratory (DPZ vs. IPB) C 0.027 0.202 0.133 0.894
Total samples available with behavioral reference C 0.005 0.008 0.560 0.577