Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 17;11:587489. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.587489

TABLE 6.

Pearson’s correlation with Arabic version of the DASS total score and subscales.

Total Negative impact Limitations Positive impact
Age −0.109 a 0.106 0.073 −0.085 a
Gender 0.178 b 0.200 b 0.115 a 0.118 a
Nationality 0.004 0.054 0.019 0.077
Education 0.012 0.000 0.017 0.042
Income 0.017 0.004 0.056 0.092
Marital status 0.049 0.092 0.002 0.028
Employment −0.231 b −0.245 b −0.161 b −0.157 b
Years on warfarin 0.043 0.075 0.049 0.017
Years on apixiban 0.197 0.149 0.271 a 0.05
Dose change last year 0.055 0.068 0.067 0.004
Hospitalized for bleeding last year 0.033 0.050 0.055 -0.019
Stroke 0.045 0.060 0.035 0.018
TIA 0.032 0.050 0.035 0.004
DVT 0.235 b 0.256 b 0.139 b 0.171 b
AF 0.004 0.003 0.025 0.010
MVR −0.150 b −0.179 b −0.083 −0.100 a
Smoking 0.159 b 0.138 b 0.133 b 0.117 a
EQ-mobility −-0.186 b −0.197 b −0.144 b −0.116 a
EQ-self-care −0.221 b −0.235 b −0.168 b −0.138 b
EQ- usual activities −0.281 b −0.302 b −0.199 b −0.186 b
EQ-pain/discomfort −0.305 b −0.264 b −0.230 b −0.249 b
EQ- anxiety/depression −0.354 b −0.313 b −0.243 b −0.305 b
EQ-VAS −0.133 b −0.155 b 0.083 0.088
a

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

b

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

NOTE: As lower DASS total scores represent greater satisfaction, a negative correlation means greater satisfaction.