Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 8;9(12):1191–1201. doi: 10.1530/EC-20-0370

Table 4.

Selection of the optimal model for identifying diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Contrast Difference in AUC (95% CI) P-value IDI (95% CI) P-value NRI (95% CI) P-value
Training set
 Model1–Model7 0 <−0.01 (<−0.01, <0.01) 0.170 −0.04 (−0.44, 0.35) 0.840
 Model2–Model7 −0.05 (−0.10, <0.01) 0.053 −0.10 (−0.15, −0.04) <0.001 −0.69 (−1.06, −0.32) <0.001
 Model3–Model7 −0.06 (−0.12, −0.01) 0.021 −0.11 (−0.16, −0.05) <0.001 −0.61 (−0.99, −0.24) 0.002
 Model4–Model7 −0.06 (−0.12, 0.01) 0.096 −0.09 (−0.16, −0.02) 0.011 −0.41 (−0.80, −0.02) 0.043
 Model5–Model7 −0.07 (−0.13, −0.01) 0.027 −0.12 (−0.18, −0.05) <0.001 −0.57 (−0.95, −0.19) 0.005
 Model6–Model7 −0.01 (−0.05, 0.02) 0.447 −0.03 (−0.07, 0.02) 0.228 −0.29 (−0.68, 0.11) 0.157
Testing set
 Model1–Model6 0 <−0.01 (<−0.01, <−0.01) <0.001 −1.10 (−1.61, 0.59) <0.001
 Model2–Model6 −0.04 (−0.16, 0.09) 0.560 −0.09 (−0.21, 0.03) 0.134 −0.50 (−1.09, 0.09) 0.114
 Model3–Model6 −0.08 (−0.18, 0.03) 0.161 −0.11 (−0.22, <0.01) 0.057 −0.80 (−1.36, −0.24) 0.011
 Model4–Model6 0.03 (−0.08, 0.13) 0.606 0.06 (−0.08, 0.20) 0.394 0.60 (<0.01, 1.19) 0.058
 Model5–Model6 −0.07 (−0.22, 0.08) 0.367 −0.14 (−0.29, 0.01) 0.074 −0.40 (−1.00, 0.20) 0.206
 Model6–Model7 0.03 (−0.03, 0.09) 0.304 0.04 (<0.01, 0.16) 0.033 1.00 (0.48, 1.52) 0.002

Model 1: LA/total n-3 PUFAs + systolic BP + duration of diabetes; Model 2: GLA/total n-3 PUFAs + systolic BP + duration of diabetes; Model 3: EDA/total n-3 PUFAs + systolic BP + duration of diabetes; Model 4: DGLA/total n-3 PUFAs + systolic BP + duration of diabetes; Model 5: AA/total n-3 PUFAs + systolic BP + duration of diabetes; Model 6: the 1st PC + the 2nd PC + systolic BP + duration of diabetes; Model 7: Total n-6/n-3 PUFAs + systolic BP + duration of diabetes.

AUC, the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve; IDI, the integrated discrimination improvement; NRI, the net reclassification improvement.