Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244749

Table 3. Analysis of variance for the fitted response surface quadratic model.

Source Sum of squares DF Mean square F-value P-value
Model 0.11 14 8.105E ‒ 03 4.46 0.0042
X1: Ultrasonic power 8.167E ‒ 06 1 8.167E ‒ 06 4.498E ‒ 03 0.9475
X2: Extraction temperature 1.242E ‒ 04 1 1.242E ‒ 04 0.068 0.7975
X3: Liquid/solid ratio 0.018 1 0.018 9.95 0.0070
X4: Ultrasonic time 0.011 1 0.011 5.96 0.0285
X1 × X2 3.788E ‒ 03 1 3.788E ‒ 03 2.09 0.1706
X1 × X3 2.186E ‒ 03 1 2.186E ‒ 03 1.20 0.2911
X1 × X4 1.071E ‒ 04 1 1.071E ‒ 04 0.059 0.8116
X2 × X3 5.546E ‒ 04 1 5.546E ‒ 04 0.31 0.5892
X2 × X4 2.401E ‒ 05 1 2.401E ‒ 05 0.013 0.9101
X3 × X4 1.346E ‒ 04 1 1.346E ‒ 04 0.074 0.7894
X12 5.629E ‒ 05 1 5.629E ‒ 05 0.031 0.8628
X22 0.072 1 0.072 39.88 < 0.0001
X32 8.317E ‒ 03 1 8.317E ‒ 03 4.58 0.0504
X42 6.343E ‒ 03 1 6.343E ‒ 03 3.49 0.0827
Residual 0.025 14 1.816E ‒ 03
Lack of fit 0.023 10 2.340E ‒ 03 4.63 0.0765
Pure error 2.023E ‒ 03 4 5.057E ‒ 04
Cor total 0.14 28
R2 = 0.8170
Adj R2 = 0.6339
Adeq precision = 6.952
CV(%) = 20.19