Table 3. The effect of prophylactic INH on the 1-year incidence of TB according to the presence of risk factors.
Non-high-risk subgroup (n = 1526) | High-risk subgroup (n = 92) a | |
---|---|---|
Control group, n | 1390 | 76 |
INH group, n | 136 | 16 |
Number of TB cases / Observation period in the control group | 12 / 1362.2 person-years | 7 / 69.5 person-years |
Number of TB cases / Observation period in the INH group | 2 / 132.7 person-years | 0 / 13.5 person-years |
Crude hazards ratio of the INH group (95% CI) | 0.76 (0.38–7.62) | 0.31 (0.002–2.46) |
Adjusted hazards ratio of the INH group (95% CI) | 1.01 (0.20–5.08) b | 0.37 (0.002–5.10) c |
CI, confidence interval; INH, isoniazid; TB, tuberculosis.
a Firth penalized maximum likelihood was used due to complete separation of outcome.
b Included concomitant steroid pulse, duration of high-dose steroid treatment from the baseline and cumulative steroid dose as covariates, and was also adjusted for clustering.
c Included age, male sex, duration of high-dose steroid treatment from the baseline and mean steroid dose used during the prior 6 months as covariates, and was also adjusted for clustering.