Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244239

Table 3. The effect of prophylactic INH on the 1-year incidence of TB according to the presence of risk factors.

Non-high-risk subgroup (n = 1526) High-risk subgroup (n = 92) a
Control group, n 1390 76
INH group, n 136 16
Number of TB cases / Observation period in the control group 12 / 1362.2 person-years 7 / 69.5 person-years
Number of TB cases / Observation period in the INH group 2 / 132.7 person-years 0 / 13.5 person-years
Crude hazards ratio of the INH group (95% CI) 0.76 (0.38–7.62) 0.31 (0.002–2.46)
Adjusted hazards ratio of the INH group (95% CI) 1.01 (0.20–5.08) b 0.37 (0.002–5.10) c

CI, confidence interval; INH, isoniazid; TB, tuberculosis.

a Firth penalized maximum likelihood was used due to complete separation of outcome.

b Included concomitant steroid pulse, duration of high-dose steroid treatment from the baseline and cumulative steroid dose as covariates, and was also adjusted for clustering.

c Included age, male sex, duration of high-dose steroid treatment from the baseline and mean steroid dose used during the prior 6 months as covariates, and was also adjusted for clustering.