Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0243467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243467

Fig 3. Hypothetical graph that weighs up the net benefit of different interventions in youth mental health settings.

Fig 3

This hypothetical graph weighs up the costs of intervention (i.e. individual and clinician burden) against the number of people we are willing to treat in order to prevent future self-harm. As the costs of intervention increase, naturally the acceptable number of false positives reduce because intervention is likely to result in greater costs than benefits (resulting in a negative net benefit). However, when the costs of intervention are low, a higher number of false positives are acceptable to successfully prevent one case of self-harm (resulting in positive net benefit).