Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2020 Nov 17:113248. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113248

Statistical results used to determine model selection for mixed-effects models. Full models included estrous stage (proestrus, estrus, Metestrus, diestrus 1, and diestrus 2), recording condition (dyad, elicited, and isolation), and their interaction as fixed effects and individual rat as the random effect. Reduced models did not include the interaction term but all other fixed and random effects. ANOVAs were used to test full versus reduced models. No significance resulted in selection of reduced models. Numbers were rounded to the third decimal place.

ANOVAs of full vs reduced models for acoustic variables with nonsignificant interaction terms.

Acoustic Parameter npar AIC BIC logLik deviance Chisq Df Pr(>Chisq)
Frequency Bandwidth 8 86042.014 86100.948 −43013.007 86026.014
12 86046.176 86134.577 −43011.088 86022.176 3.837 4 0.428

Slope 8 166593.567 166652.501 −83288.783 166577.567
12 166593.189 166681.590 −83284.595 166569.189 8.378 4 0.079

Frequency Standard Deviation 8 58644.592 58703.526 −29314.296 58628.592
12 58650.211 58738.612 −29313.106 58626.211 2.381 4 0.666

Sinuosity 8 25827.782 25886.716 −12905.891 25811.782
12 25833.094 25921.495 −12904.547 25809.094 2.688 4 0.611