Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Histopathology. 2020 Sep 14;78(2):252–264. doi: 10.1111/his.14211

Table 1.

Patient and tumour characteristics (n = 372)

Gender, n%
 Male 189, 50.8%
 Female 183, 49.2%
Age, mean ± SD 65.7 ± 12.9
Race, n%
 Caucasian 314, 84.4%
 African American 49, 13.2%
 Othera 9, 2.4%
History of prior malignancy, n%
 Yes 54, 14.5%
 No 318, 85.5%
Known Lynch syndrome, n%
 Yes 7, 1.9%
 No 365, 98.1%
CEA level at resection, n, mean ± SD 275, 6.8 ± 21.2
Adjuvant chemotherapy, n% n = 371
 Yes 105, 28.3%
 No 266, 71.7%
Location, n%
 Right 227, 61.0%
 Left 145, 39.0%
Tumour buds, n%
 Low 302, 81.2%
 Intermediate 31, 8.3%
 High 39, 10.5%
Desmoplastic reaction, n%
 Immature/myxoid 67, 18.0%
 Intermediate 140, 37.6%
 Mature 165, 44.4%%
Intra-epithelial tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, n%
 Yes 130, 35.0%
 No 242, 65.1%
Tumour grade, n%
 Well/moderately differentiated 294, 79.0%
 Poorly differentiated 56, 15.1%
 Mucinous carcinoma 22, 5.9%
Lymphovascular invasion, n%
 Yes 138, 37.1%
 No 234, 62.9%
Perineural invasion, n%
 Yes 57, 15.3%
 No 315, 84.7%
Tumour deposits, n%
 Yes 43, 11.6%
 No 329, 88.4%
Number of tumour deposits, mean ± SD 0.39 ± 2.07
Number of involved lymph nodes, mean ± SD 1.29 ± 2.73
Number of lymph nodes evaluated, mean ± SD 20.1 ± 8.0
MMR expression, n% n = 324
 Deficient 67, 20.7%
 Proficient 257, 79.3%
pT stage, n%
 pT1 26, 7.0%
 pT2 74, 19.9%
 pT3 224, 60.2%
 pT4 48, 12.9%
pN stage, n%
 pN0 233, 62.6%
 pN1 89, 23.9%
 pN2 50, 13.4%
pTNM prognostic group, n%
 I 83, 22.3%
 II 150, 40.3%
 III 139, 37.4%

SD, standard deviation; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; MMR, mismatch repair; pT, pathological T category; pTNM, pathological tumour–node–metastasis.

a

Asian or Hispanic

Percentages might not total 100% due to rounding