Table 5.
Summary of the three main sufficient conditions for the intermediate solution of satisfaction.
| Frequency cutoff: 1 | Overall satisfaction | Clinical educator satisfaction | Environment satisfaction | Activity satisfaction | Organization satisfaction | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consistency cut-off: 0.94 | Consistency cut-off: 0.85 | Consistency cut-off: 0.93 | Consistency cut-off: 0.93 | Consistency cut-off: 0.94 | |||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Preference in the choice of the practice center | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
| High mean score | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| Distance to the practice center | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ● | ||||||
| Number of students per clinical educator period | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | |||||||
| Hospitalization | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||||||
| Private management | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ||||
| Hospital | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | |
| Raw coverage | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Unique coverage | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Consistency | 0.94 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.97 |
| Overall solution consistency | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.96 | ||||||||||
| Overall solution coverage | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.62 | ||||||||||
●, presence of condition; ○, absence of condition.
Expected vector for Satisfaction (Overall, clinical educator, environment, activity and organization): 1,1,0,0,1,1,1 (0: absent; 1: present) according format Fiss (2011). Terms/values in bold, type information on the model as a whole considering all the conditions, not only the most important.