Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 1;9(1):E41–E50. doi: 10.1055/a-1293-7327

Table 3. Outcomes based on network meta-analysis.

Study outcome No. of Studies compared ECU vs HD ECV vs HD ECV vs ECU
Relative risk (95 % CI) I 2
Overall PDR  9 1.25 (1.10–1.43) 1 1.14 (1.02–1.29) 1 0.92 (0.77–1.09) 70.9 %
PDR 2  3 1.08 (0.99–1.17) 1.01 (0.91–1.12) 0.94 (0.82–1.07)  0 %
PDR 3  6 1.35 (1.20–1.52) 1 1.21 (1.10–1.33) 1 0.90 (0.77–1.04) 34.5 %
PDR 4  5 1.14 (1.01–1.29) 1 1.06 (0.96–1.18) 0.93 (0.80–1.09) 47.8 %
PDR 5  4 1.40 (1.20–1.63) 1 1.29 (1.13–1.47) 1 0.92 (0.75–1.13) 23.7 %
Overall ADR 12 1.22 (1.06–1.40) 1 1.12 (0.98–1.29) 0.92 (0.76–1.12) 69.2 %
ADR 2  5 1.07 (0.96–1.19) 1.00 (0.88–1.13) 0.93 (0.79–1.10) 22.8 %
ADR 3  7 1.37 (1.16–1.61) 1 1.22 (1.07–1.42) 1 0.90 (0.72–1.12) 45.3 %
ADR 4  7 1.16 (0.99–1.34) 1.05 (0.91–1.20) 0.90 (0.74–1.11) 63.0 %
ADR 5  5 1.33 (1.06–1.67) 1 1.31 (1.05–1.64) 1 0.99 (0.72–1.36) 42.5 %
AADR  4 1.09 (0.77–1.53) 1.08 (0.79–1.46) 0.99 (0.63–1.58) 38.1 %
SADR  3 0.90 (0.58–1.41) 1.87 (1.13–3.11) 1 2.07 (1.06–4.06) 1  0 %
NDR  3 0.72 (0.19–2.67) 1.34 (0.71–2.55) 1.87 (0.44–8.02) 52.1 %
CIR  7 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 1.00 (0.99–1.01)  0 %
Mean difference (95 % CI)
Overall MPP  6 0.53 (0.39–0.66) 1 -0.13 (-0.30–0.05) -0.65 (-0.87–– 0.43) 1  0 %
Overall MAP  9 0.46 (0.13–0.79) 1 0.12 (-0.21–0.46) -0.34 (-0.81–0.13) 92.5 %

AADR, advanced adenoma detection rate; ADR, adenoma detection rate; CI, confidence interval; CIR, cecal intubation rate; ECU, first-generation Endocuff colonoscopy; ECV, Endocuff Vision colonoscopy; HD, high-definition colonoscopy; MAP, mean adenoma per procedure; MPP, mean polyp per procedure; NDR, neoplasia detection rate; PDR, polyp detection rate; SADR, serrated adenoma detection rate.

1

P < 0.05 for the study estimate

2

Denotes studies with control ADR > 40 %

3

Denotes studies with control ADR ≤ 40 %

4

Denotes studies with control ADR > 30 %

5

Denotes studies with control ADR ≤ 30 %