Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 14;117(52):33578–33585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013231117

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

MEG rms analysis demonstrating a significant difference in activation patterns between 50 and 600 ms for both words and images at visit 1 for stroke patients versus controls. This difference was no longer significant for words at visit 2. Activation patterns appear more visually similar between groups at visit 2, especially when compared to the visit 1 activation patterns of only the participants (n = 6 patients and 6 controls) who had repeat imaging performed (Inlays). Error bars represent the within-subject SEM (48).