Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 2;21:2. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03002-3

Table 1.

Comparing Each SPTSS Cluster with Other Variables

Avoidance Arousal Re-experience
Negative(n = 910) - % Positive
(n = 1040) - %
P value Negative (n = 693) - % Positive
(n = 1257) - %
P value Negative
(n = 800) - %
Positive
(n = 1150) - %
P value P value#
Gender
 Male 247 27.1% 280 26.9% NS 208 30.0% 319 25.4% 0.073 NS 239 29.9% 288 25.0% 0.051 NS NS
 Female 663 72.9% 760 73.1% 485 70.0% 938 74.6% 561 70.1% 862 75.0%
Consanguinity
 No 656 72.1% 759 73.0% NS 496 71.6% 919 73.1% NS 591 73.9% 824 71.7% NS NS
 Third-degree relatives 134 14.7% 166 16.0% 103 14.9% 197 15.7% 111 13.9% 189 16.4%
 Fourth-degree relatives 53 5.8% 44 4.2% 42 6.1% 55 4.4% 47 5.9% 50 4.3%
 Distant relatives 67 7.4% 71 6.8% 52 7.5% 86 6.8% 51 6.4% 87 7.6%
Marital status
 Single 750 82.5% 866 83.4% NS 574 82.9% 1042 83.0% NS 661 82.7% 955 83.2% NS NS
 Engaged 47 5.2% 39 3.8% 31 4.5% 55 4.4% 31 3.9% 55 4.8%
 Married 97 10.7% 120 11.6% 78 11.3% 139 11.1% 94 11.8% 123 10.7%
 Divorced 10 1.1% 11 1.1% 6 0.9% 15 1.2% 9 1.1% 12 1.0%
 Widowed 5 0.6% 2 0.2% 3 0.4% 4 0.3% 4 0.5% 3 0.3%
Educational level
 Primary School 2 0.2% 23 2.3% < 0.0001 2 0.3% 25 1.9% < 0.0001 5 0.6% 22 1.8% 0.004 0.001
 High School 45 4.9% 81 7.8% 30 4.3% 96 7.6% 44 5.5% 82 7.1%
 University or any high institute 807 88.7% 864 83.2% 624 90.0% 1047 83.4% 700 87.5% 971 84.5%
 Masters or PhD 56 6.2% 70 6.7% 37 5.3% 89 7.1% 51 6.4% 75 6.5%
SES
 Lower 14 1.5% 16 1.5% 8 1.2% 22 1.8% 9 1.1% 21 1.8%
 Upper Lower 199 21.9% 283 27.2% 0.028 NS 136 19.6% 346 27.5% 0.003 176 22.0% 306 26.6% 0.055 NS 0.005 NS
 Middle 490 53.8% 554 53.3% 393 56.7% 651 51.8% 435 54.4% 609 53.0%
 Upper 207 22.7% 187 18.0% 156 22.5% 238 18.9% 180 22.5% 214 18.6%
Working
 No 497 65.0% 600 67.6% NS 385 67.2% 712 66.0% NS 433 64.5% 664 67.8% NS NS
 Yes 267 35.0% 287 32.4% 188 32.8% 366 34.0% 238 35.5% 316 32.2%
Age groups
 14–18 24 2.6% 27 2.6% 15 2.2% 36 2.9% 14 1.8% 37 3.2%
 19–25 720 79.1% 818 78.7% < 0.0001 563 81.2% 975 77.6% < 0.0001 639 79.9% 899 78.2% < 0.0001 0.066 NS
 26–45 147 16.2% 186 17.9% 102 14.7% 231 18.4% 128 16.0% 205 17.8%
 46–65 19 2.1% 9 0.9% 13 1.9% 15 1.2% 19 2.4% 9 0.8%
Losing someone close due to war
 No 351 38.6% 346 33.3% 0.039 NS 270 39.0% 427 34.0% 0.067 NS 339 42.4% 358 31.1% < 0.0001 0.001
 Yes 559 61.4% 694 66.7% 423 61.0% 830 66.0% 461 57.6% 792 68.9%
A relative being endangered by the war
 No 138 15.2% 146 14.0% NS 113 16.3% 171 13.6% NS 132 16.5% 152 13.2% NS NS
 Yes 772 84.8% 894 86.0% 580 83.7% 1086 86.4% 668 83.5% 998 86.8%
Distressed from war noises
 Negative 195 21.4% 211 20.3% NS 185 26.7% 211 17.6% < 0.0001 196 24.5% 210 18.3% 0.001 0.003
 Positive 715 78.6% 829 79.7% 508 73.3% 1036 82.4% 604 75.5% 940 81.7%
Changing place of living due to war
 No 495 54.4% 482 46.3% 361 52.1% 616 49.0% 413 51.6% 564 49.0%
 Within the same city 195 21.4% 233 22.4% 0.004 138 19.9% 290 23.1% NS 173 21.6% 255 22.2% NS 0.010 NS
 With changing city 195 21.4% 293 28.2% 172 24.8% 316 25.1% 191 23.9% 297 25.8%
 Both 25 2.7% 32 3.1% 22 3.2% 35 2.8% 23 2.9% 34 3.0%
Number of times changing places of living due to war
 Never 495 37.8% 482 31.5% 361 38.0% 616 32.5% 413 36.4% 564 33.1%
 Once 123 22.7% 101 16.7% < 0.0001 103 23.8% 121 17.2% 0.001 107 22.4% 117 17.6% 0.016 NS < 0.0001
 Twice 87 13.5% 124 15.9% 63 11.7% 148 16.5% 91 14.8% 120 14.8%
 Thrice and more 205 25.9% 333 35.9% 166 26.6% 372 33.8% 189 26.5% 349 34.5%
The main reason declared of stress in the last period:a
 Educational 197 39.5% 191 31.0% 155 43.9% 233 30.6% 173 41.2% 215 30.9%
 Economical 58 11.6% 69 11.2% 0.014 NS 39 11.0% 88 11.5% 0.0001 54 12.9% 73 10.5% 0.001 0.001
 Social 212 42.5% 292 47.4% 143 40.5% 361 47.4% 164 39.0% 340 48.9%
 War-related 20 4.0% 30 4.9% 8 2.3% 42 5.5% 17 4.0% 33 4.7%
 Medical 8 1.6% 25 4.1% 5 1.4% 28 3.7% 11 2.6% 22 3.2%
 Other 4 0.8% 9 1.5% 3 0.8% 10 1.3% 1 0.2% 12 1.7%
Do you consider that the crisis was the main cause of your distress lately?a
 No 155 22.4% 107 12.6% 133 25.6% 129 12.6% 127 20.9% 135 14.5%
 Kind of 326 47.2% 336 39.6% < 0.0001 150 45.5% 426 41.7% < 0.0001 294 48.4% 368 39.4% < 0.0001 < 0.0001
 Yes totally 210 30.4% 210 47.8% 319 28.9% 466 45.6% 186 30.6% 430 46.1%

Where NS Not significant

Chi-square test was used in this table

#This p value is calculated between having no, one, two or three positive clusters

aThese were not included in the regression as they do not generate extra results and they overlap with most variables

When using Bonferroni correction, P = (0.05\14) ≈ 0.004 or less to be statistically significant