Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;7:580550. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.580550

Table 1A.

Changes in targeted phenolic compounds in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. subsp. chinensis).

Phenolic compounds (mg kg−1) Raw Boiling Steaming Microwaving Stir frying
Kaempferol-sophoroside-hexoside 50.4 ± 0.01*a 23.77 ± 4.78c 42.67 ± 3.03b 19.87 ± 3.24d 57.98 ± 5.90a
Kaempferol-3-O-hydroxyferuloyl-trihexoside 4.10 ± 2.77c nd 7.45 ± 4.72b nd 33.44 ± 2.93a
Kaempferol-3-O-hydroxyferuloyl-diglucoside 27.7 ± 0.05a nd nd nd 2.50 ± 0.23b
Kaempferol-dihexoside 20.3 ± 0.06b 4.84 ± 0.75d 16.13 ± 0.25b 9.11 ± 4.11c 22.69 ± 0.08a
Isorhamnetin-O-dihexoside 0.13 ± 0.60d 0.219 ± 0.0c 2.61 ± 0.47b 2.41 ± 0.55b 6.26 ± 0.0a
Isorhamnetin-O-hexoside 2.34 ± 0.02d 17.39 ± 0.52b 33.01 ± 2.59a 13.57 ± 5.29c 31.65 ± 1.58a
Sinapoyl malate 0.04 ± 0.07c nd 21.13 ± 0.10b nd 58.13 ± 48.8a
Rutin 7.20 ± 2.77d 11.11 ± 5.05c 18.68 ± 0.56b 18.87 ± 5.75c 25.99 ± 3.87a
Total polyphenols 112.21 57.329 141.68 63.84 238.64

Rows with similar alphabetic letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 according to Fisher's LSD test.

nd, not detected,

*

standard deviation (n = 3, cumulated sample of 10 makes 1 n replicate).