Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;11:605787. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.605787

Table 3.

Correlations between lumbar repositioning errors (REs) and relative proprioceptive weighting (RPW) in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and asymptomatic controls.

Variables Spearman's rank correlation coefficients p-value
CLBP young (18–44 years) RPW on stable surface and lumbar RE −0.02 0.9
RPW on unstable surface and lumbar RE 0.11 0.6
CLBP middle-aged (45–65 years) RPW on stable surface and lumbar RE −0.15 0.3
RPW on unstable surface and lumbar RE 0.07 0.6
Asymptomatic young (18–44 years) RPW on stable surface and lumbar RE −0.20 0.3
RPW on unstable surface and lumbar RE 0.02 0.9
Asymptomatic middle-aged (45–65 years) RPW on stable surface and lumbar RE 0.20 0.2
RPW on unstable surface and lumbar RE 0.67 0.1

Calculation of p-values and correlation coefficients was performed using Spearman rank correlation test. The Spearman correlation coefficient values can range from +1 to −1 where +1 indicates a perfect positive association of ranks, 0 indicates no association between ranks and −1 indicates perfect negative association of ranks. The strength of the correlation can be classified as very weak (0.00–0.19), weak (0.20–0.39), moderate (0.40–0.59), strong (0.60–0.79), and very strong (0.80–1.0).