Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cornea. 2021 Feb 1;40(2):258–267. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002575

Table 1. TBUT in Eyes with Pterygium vs. Normal Controls.

TBUT was found to be significantly lower in patients with pterygium vs. controls in 21 of 28 studies. Eighteen studies reported TBUT as an average of three measurements, three studies reported TBUT as an average of less than three measurements, and seven studies did not specify the number of measurements used to determine TBUT.

Year Author n = No. patients, No. eyes Results No. measurements
2020 Zhao et al.(12) n = 35, 40 4.02 s lower in pterygium 2
2020 Patkar et al.(13) n = 100, 200 0.93 s lower in pterygium 1
2019 Safarzadeh et al.(14) n = 95, 190 4.50 s lower in pterygium 3
2019 Wanzeler et al.(15) n = 83, 83 0.73 s lower in pterygiumN Not reported
2019 Gupta et al.(16) n = 50, 100 2.08 s lower in pterygium 3
2019 Li et al.(17) n = 108, 108 3.03 s lower in pterygiumN Not reported
2018 Küçük et al.(18) n = 64, 96 5.40 s lower in pterygium1 3
2017 Ye et al.(19) n = 80, 80 3.90 s lower in pterygium 3
2017 Manhas et al.(20) n = 270, 270 4.34 s lower in pterygium 3
2017 Antony et al.(21) n = 100, 200 3.60 s lower in pterygium Not reported
2017 Wu et al.(22) n = 99, 99 2.90 s lower in pterygiumN Not reported
2014 Ozsutcu et al.(23) n = 65, 130 2.00 s lower in pterygium 3
2014 Kampitak et al.(24) n = 92, 184 5.80 s lower in pterygium Not reported
2014 Gonnermann et al.(25) n = 40, 40 6.10 s lower in pterygium 1
2014 Hashemi et al.(26) n = 1008, 1008 Lower in pterygium2 3
2013 Roka et al.(3) n = 228, 228 5.96 s lower in pterygium 3
2013 Rajab et al.(28) n = 110, 110 3.60 s lower in pterygium3 3
2012 Julio et al.(27) n = 60, 60 No difference 3
2010 Bandyopadhyay et al.(29) n = 100, 100 Lower in pterygium2 Not reported
2009 Lu et al.(30) n = 2112, 2112 Lower in pterygium2 3
2006 Lekhanont et al.(31) n = 550, 550 Lower in pterygium2 3
2005 Balogun et al.(6) n = 221, 221 1.96 s lower in pterygium4 3
2001 Ishioka et al.(7) n = 20, 40 3.30 s lower in pterygium 1
2001 Ergin et al.(32) n = 129, 202 1.38 s lower in pterygium 3
1998 Kadayifçilar et al.(33) n = 140, 140 3.57 s lower in pterygium 3
1991 Rajiv et al.(34) n = 106, 106 4.80 s lower in pterygium5 Not reported
1984 Pandey et al.(35) n = 1400, 1763 No difference6,2 3
1980 Taylor et al.(36) n = 30, 54 Lower in pterygium2 3

Statistically significant

N

Average non-invasive tear break up time (NIBUTav)

1

Study included pingueculum only

2

Absolute values not reported

3

Study included pterygium and pingueculum; 3.60 s lower in pterygium, 3.90 s lower in pingueculum

4

Study included pterygium and pingueculum; 1.96 s lower in pterygium, 0.90 s higher in pingueculum

5

Statistical values not reported

6

Abnormal TBUT defined as < 30 s