Table 2. Schirmer Test in Eyes with Pterygium vs. Controls.
Year | Author | n = No. patients, No. eyes | Result | Eyelid position | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schirmer I Test | |||||
2020 | Zhao et al.(12) | n = 35, 40 | 2.40 mm lower in pterygium† | O | |
2020 | Patkar et al.(13) | n = 100, 200 | 1.54 mm lower in pterygium† | O | |
2019 | Safarzadeh et al.(14) | n = 95, 190 | 4.60 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
2019 | Gupta et al.(16) | n = 50, 100 | 1.98 mm lower in pterygium†1 | U | |
2019 | Li et al.(17) | n = 108, 108 | 0.41 mm lower in pterygium | C | |
2017 | Ye et al.(19) | n = 80, 80 | 1.40 mm higher in pterygium | U | |
2017 | Manhas et al.(20) | n = 270, 270 | 3.23 mm lower in pterygium† | O | |
2017 | Antony et al.(21) | n = 100, 200 | 4.60 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
2017 | Wu et al.(22) | n = 99, 99 | 1.82 mm lower in pterygium | C | |
2014 | Ozsutcu et al.(23) | n = 65, 130 | 1.40 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
2014 | Gonnermann et al.(25) | n = 40, 40 | 0.20 mm lower in pterygium | U | |
2013 | Roka et al.(3) | n = 228, 228 | 4.03 mm lower in pterygium | U | |
2012 | Julio et al.(27) | n = 60, 60 | 1.00 mm lower in pterygium | C | |
2010 | Bandyopadhyay et al.(29) | n = 100, 100 | Lower in pterygium†2 | U | |
2006 | Lekhanont et al.(31) | n = 550, 550 | Lower in pterygium2 | U | |
2001 | Ishioka et al.(7) | n = 20, 40 | 0.80 mm lower in pterygium | U | |
1998 | Kadayifçilar et al.(33) | n = 140, 140 | 2.76 mm lower in pterygium | O | |
1991 | Rajiv et al.(34) | n = 106, 106 | 7.40 mm lower in pterygium3 | U | |
1980 | Taylor et al.(36) | n = 30, 54 | Lower in pterygium2 | O | |
Basic Secretion Test | |||||
2017 | Manhas et al.(20) | n = 270, 270 | 2.08 mm lower in pterygium† | O | |
2014 | Hashemi et al.(26) | n = 1008, 1008 | Higher in pterygium2 | U | |
2013 | Roka et al.(3) | n = 228, 228 | 3.24 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
2009 | Lu et al.(30) | n = 2112, 2112 | Lower in pterygium†2 | C | |
2006 | Lekhanont et al.(31) | n = 550, 550 | Lower in pterygium†2 | U | |
2001 | Ishioka et al.(7) | n = 20,40 | 3.70 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
2001 | Ergin et al.(32) | n = 129, 202 | 2.41 mm lower in pterygium | O | |
1978 | Biedner et al.(37) | n = 60, 120 | 0.32 mm lower in pterygium | U | |
Schirmer II Test | |||||
2020 | Patkar et al.(13) | n = 100, 200 | 0.59 mm lower in pterygium | O | |
2018 | Küçük et al.(18) | n = 64, 96 | 6.00 mm lower in pterygium†4 | O | |
2017 | Antony et al.(21) | n = 100, 200 | 5.50 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
2014 | Gonnermann et al.(25) | n = 40, 40 | 2.11 mm lower in pterygium | U | |
2010 | Bandyopadhyay et al.(29) | n = 100, 100 | Lower in pterygium†2 | U | |
2003 | Chaidaroon et al.(38) | n = 30, 60 | 0.80 mm lower in pterygium† | O | |
Unspecified | |||||
2014 | Kampitak et al.(24) | n = 92, 184 | 0.20 mm lower in pterygium | U | |
1984 | Pandey et al.(35) | n = 1400, 1763 | 6.61 mm lower in pterygium† | U | |
1983 | Pandey et al.(39) | n = 1200, 1400 | 10.11 mm lower in pterygium† | U |
O = open, C = closed, U = unspecified
Statistically significant
Significant for pterygium ≥ 2 mm, but not significant for pterygium < 1 mm or 1-2 mm
Absolute values not reported
Significance unspecified
Study included pingueculum only