Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cornea. 2021 Feb 1;40(2):258–267. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002575

Table 6. Schirmer Test in Eyes with Pterygium Pre-excision vs. Post-excision.

The majority of studies demonstrated improvement in Schirmer values after pterygium excision. However, only two studies found this improvement to be statistically significant. The results seemed to be independent of surgical technique. Additionally, the majority of studies did not specify eyelid position during the tests.

Year Author n = No. patients, No. eyes Surgical Technique Follow-up Period (m) Results post-surgery Eyelid position
Schirmer I Test
2020 Zhao et al.(12) n = 35, 40 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 1, 3 Improvement O
2020 Patkar et al.(13) n = 100, 200 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 10d, 1, 2 Improvement O
2019 Li et al.(17) n = 108, 108 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 1, 3, 6 Improvement C
2019 Jeong et al.(5) n = 30, 30 Conjunctival autograft 1, 3 Improvement U
2017 Drvmvrvprasadarao et al.(40) n = 80, 80 Conjunctival autograft 3, 12, 18 Improvement1 U
2017 Mittal et al.(41) n = 43, 43 Conjunctival autograft 6 Improvement U
2016 Julio et al.(42) n = 32, 32 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 1 No Improvement U
2013 Türkyılmaz et al.(45) n = 74, 74 Dissociated edges of conjunctiva sutured together 3, 12, 18 Improvement1 U
2009 Dong et al.(48) n = 12, 12 Not Reported 1 Improvement2 U
2007 Li et al.(49) n = 70, 70 Bare-sclera 1 Not Reported U
Basic Secretion Test
2015 Kampitak et al.(44) n = 40, 40 Amniotic membrane graft 1 Improvement U
2006 Kiliç et al.(50) n = 14, 14 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 1, 6 Improvement3 U
Schirmer II Test
2020 Patkar et al.(13) n = 100, 200 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 10d, 1, 2 Improvement O
2017 Mittal et al.(41) n = 43, 43 Conjunctival autograft 6 Improvement U
Unspecified
2017 Wang et al.(51) n = 56, 56 Conjunctival autograft 1d, 1w, 1, 6 Improvement U
2011 Wang et al.(47) n = 60, 60 Limbal-conjunctival autograft 1 No difference U

m = months, d = days, w = weeks, O = open, C = closed, U = unspecified

Statistically significant

1

Not significant for both no recurrence of pterygium and recurrence of pterygium

2

Study included pingueculum only

3

1m: No improvement, 6m: Improvement