Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression predicting clinically significant decisional conflict (N = 248^a).

	No.	CSDC	B (SE)	p	OR	95% CI for OR
Constant			−0.85 (1.24)	0.49	0.43
Educational level
Low	10	40%	−1.37 (0.77)	0.08	0.26	0.06–1.16
Intermediate	109	68%	−0.23 (0.32)	0.48	0.80	0.42–1.50
High	129	69%	ref
BR preference
Strong preference for BR	142	52%	ref
Slight preference for BR	51	86%	1.82 (0.47)	0.00	6.19	2.47–15.54
No preference for or against BR	32	94%	2.47 (0.76)	0.00	11.84	2.68–52.28
Slight preference for no BR	9	89%	1.63 (1.09)	0.13	5.10	0.60–43.21
Strong preference for no BR	14	86%	1.65 (0.82)	0.04	5.20	1.04–25.86
Informed by scientific article(s)	21	48%	−1.08 (0.55)	0.05	0.34	0.12–1.01
Blunting coping style (TMSI)b			−0.01 (0.03)	0.70	0.99	0.94–1.04
Anxiety (STAI-6)c			0.03 (0.01)	0.01	1.03	1.01–1.06

Abbreviations: CSDC, clinically significant decisional conflict; B, beta; SE, standard error; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BR, breast reconstruction; TMSI, Threatening Medical Situations Inventory; STAI-6, State scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.

Note. R² = 0.30 (Nagelkerke). Model χ²(9) = 59.10, p < .001. Significant values (at p < .05) are shown in bold.

^aN = 248 due to 2 missings on variable educational level.

^bMean = 34.02, Standard Deviation = 6.33.

^cMean = 46.39, Standard Deviation = 12.91.