Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;112(1):380–387. doi: 10.1111/cas.14714

TABLE 2.

Extracted DNA/RNA and success rate of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) according to biopsy methods

All Cytology sample (N = 153) Tissue sample (N = 69)
EBUS‐GS‐TBB (bronchial brushing) EBUS‐TBNA (needle washing) Pleural effusion Thoracoscopy CNB Surgical biopsy
Extracted yield of nucleic acid (ng/mL)
DNA median (range) 90 (10‐400) 70 (10‐380) 90 (10‐400) 270 (110‐330) 190 (30‐350) 70 (10‐380) 215 (100‐350)
RNA median (range) 20 (10‐790) 10 (10‐80) 20 (10‐290) 50 (10‐680) 55 (10‐340) 10 (10‐210) 260 (10‐790)
NGS success rate (95% CI)
DNA sequencing

99.1%

(96.8‐99.9)

(220/222)

98.7%

(95.4‐98.8)

(P = 0.999 a )

100%

(95.8‐100)

97.9%

(92.7‐99.7)

(P = 0.999 b )

100%

(93.6‐100)

(P = 1.00 b )

100%

(76.2‐100)

(P = 1.00 b )

100%

(82.9‐100)

(P = 1.00b)

100%

(92.2‐100)

(P = 1.00b)

100%

(82.9‐100)

RNA sequencing

85.1%

(79.8‐89.5)

(189/222)

83.0%

(76.1‐88.6)

(P = 0.224 a )

89.9%

(80.2‐95.8)

84.4%

(70.5‐93.5)

(P = 0.174 b )

80.4%

(71.1‐87.8)

(P = 0.069 b )

100%

(76.2‐100)

(P = 1.00 b )

100%

(82.9‐100)

(P = 1.00 b )

81.1%

(64.8‐92.0)

(P = 0.089 b )

100%

(82.9‐100)

Abbreviations: CNB, core needle biopsy; EBUS‐GS‐TBB, transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasound sonography guide sheath; EBUS‐TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound sonography–guided needle aspiration biopsy.

a

Success rate of cytology sample (N = 153) was compared with tissue sample (N = 69).

b

Success rate of each diagnostic modality was compared with surgical biopsy.