Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;40(1):e105164. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105164

Table 1.

Data reduction and refinement statistics.

Processing MhsT‐Tyr MhsT‐4FPhe MhsT‐Phe MhsT‐Ile c MhsT‐Leu b MhsT‐Val b
Beamline DLS‐I24 DLS‐I04 DLS‐I24 SLS‐ PXI DLS‐I04 DLS‐I24
Space group P2 P2 P2 P21 P21 P21
Unit cell dimensions
a, b, c (Å) 44.1, 49.9, 110.3 44.2, 49.9, 109.7 44.4, 49.9, 110.1 44.0, 97.3, 110.9 44.2, 215.6, 50.2 44.1, 216.1, 50.4
α, β, γ (°) 90.0, 96.8, 90.0 90.0, 96.1, 90.0 90.0, 96.8, 90.0 90.0, 96.1, 90.0 90.0, 90.05, 90.0 90.0, 90.02, 90.0
Wavelength (Å) 0.96864 0.96858 0.96860 1.00001 0.97949 0.97950
No. reflections a 69,099 (6,707) 40,499 (4,060) 41,999 (4,369) 37,578 (6,463) 114,897 (5,823) 97,704 (9,611)
Resolution a 29.8–2.30 (2.38–2.30) 43.9–2.26 (2.33–2.26) 45.5–2.25 (2.32–2.25) 43.7–3.10 (3.31–3.10) 45.5–2.35 (2.43–2.35) 29.1–2.60 (2.72–2.60)
R merge a 0.119 (0.734) 0.118 (0.677) 0.120 (0.820) 0.195 (0.815) 0.096 (0.679) 0.117 (0.950)
R pim a 0.077 (0.595) 0.091 (0.532) 0.083 (0.563) 0.124 (0.532) 0.066 (0.502) 0.075 (0.607)
II a 7.8 (1.6) 5.3 (1.3) 7.3 (2.1) 3.6 (1.2) 8.1 (1.4) 8.0 (1.2)
Completeness (%) a 97.4 (95.2) 92.9 (93.9) 98.2 (99.3) 81.6 (83.8) 98.5 (98.5) 99.5 (99.7)
Redundancy a 3.3 (3.34) 2.3 (1.3) 2.9 (3.0) 2.7 (2.5) 3.0 (2.6) 3.4 (3.4)
CC1/2 a 0.991 (0.472) 0.991 (0.472) 0.989 (0.488) 0.989 (0.636) 0.996 (0.511) 0.994 (0.489)
Wilson B‐factor 39.2 34.3 38.2 63.0 37.4 49.3
Twin fraction N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.443 (0.065)
Refinement
Resolution (Å) a 29.8–2.30 (2.38–2.30) 39.3–2.26 (2.34–2.26) 45.4–2.25 (2.33–2.25) 43.7–3.10 (3.31–3.10) 45.5–2.35 (2.43–2.35) 49.1–2.60 (2.69–2.60)
R work/R free 0.223/0.263 (0.254/0.305) 0.223/0.261 (0.291/0.299) 0.224/0.255 (0.305/0.356) 0.277/0.305 (0.340/0.355) 0.185/0.222 (0.260/0.304) 0.207/0.237 (0.306/0.355)
No. atoms
Protein 3,324 3,324 3,315 6,630 6,678 6,674
Ligand 13 13 12 18 18 16
Sodium 2 2 2 4 4 4
Detergent 103 195 107 109 176 357
Water 63 28 59 17 46 73
B‐ factors (Å2)
Protein 36.2 38.2 45.0 56.7 41.4 56.9
Ligand 26.1 28.7 31.8 52.6 34.1 48.8
Sodium 28.8 26.7 34.4 52.8 33.3 49.6
Detergent 47.9 55.8 64.1 58.2 51.7 68,4
Water 38.5 43.3 47.9 52.2 37.9 55.4
R.m.d. deviations
Bond length (Å) 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003
Bond angles (o) 0.542 0.601 0.583 0.578 0.505 0.595
Ramachandran
Favoured (%) 97.7 98.82 98.2 95.7 96.9 96.4
Outliers (%) 0 0 0 0.23 0 0
a

Values in parentheses are for highest resolution shell.

b

MhsT‐Leu was refined against the h,‐k,‐l twin law with 44.3% twinning, whereas MhsT‐Val was refined without use of twin law.

c

The refinement of the MhsT‐Ile complex was hindered by low completeness and the presence of translational NCS. Initial difference maps were consistent with the binding mode observed for the other aliphatic substrates.