Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;12:13567–13578. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S283656

Table 2.

Comparison of CEUS and DCE-MRI Features Among Benign and Malignant Non-Mass-Like Enhanced Breast Lesions

Variables Benign n (%) Malignant n (%) P
CEUS <0.001
 Shape
  Regular 10 (52.6) 9 (47.4)
  Irregular 8 (25.8) 23 (74.2)
 Margin <0.001
  Distinct 13 (72.2) 5 (27.8)
  Indistinct 5 (15.6) 27 (84.4)
 Orientation <0.001
  Parallel (height to width ratio <1) 15 (44.1) 19 (55.9)
  Not parallel (height to width ratio ≥1) 3 (11.5) 23 (88.5)
 Posterior echoes 0.007
  None 11 (47.8) 12 (52.2)
  Shadowing (decreased posterior echoes) 7 (25.9) 20 (74.1)
 Enhance pattern <0.001
  Homogeneous 9 (25.7) 26 (74.3)
  Heterogeneous 9 (50.0) 9 (50.0)
 Enhancement degree 0.027
  Hyperenhancement 11 (34.4) 21 (65.6)
  Hypoenhancement 7 (38.9) 11 (61.1)
 Radial or penetrating vessels <0.001
  Present 2 (8.0) 23 (92.0)
  Absent 16 (64.0) 9 (36.0)
 Expanded scope <0.001
  Yes 1 (4.3) 22 (95.7)
  No 17 (63.0) 10 (37.0)
DCE-MRI 0.001
 Enhance pattern
  Homogeneous 15 (53.6) 13 (46.4)
  Heterogeneous 3 (12.5) 21 (87.5)
 TIC curve <0.001
  Increasing type 11 (73.3) 4 (26.7)
  Plateau type 5 (41.7) 7 (58.3)
  Wash-out type 2 (8.0) 23 (92.0)
ADC value (10−3mm2/s) 1.3±0.24 0.9±0.17 0.001